Schools/Citizen Science A Response to "The Future of Citizen Science"
作者： Matthew Weinstein
DOI:
关键词: Social movement 、 Social science education 、 Law 、 Democracy 、 Social justice 、 Science education 、 Sociology 、 Restructuring 、 Opposition (politics) 、 Citizen science 、 Public administration
摘要: This paper builds on Mueller, Tippins, and Bryan's to ask how neoliberal restructuring impacts the form of appropriate possible democratic science/education. It examines compatibilities between antidemocratic tendencies current schooling common forms citizen science. also clarifies several details regarding street- medic movement. The suggests that distinguishing democracy as participation opposition would help clarify forms, limits, possibilities science in schooling.
参考文章(11)
Michael W. Apple, Global Crises, Social Justice, and Education Routledge. pp. 1- 23 ,(2010) , 10.4324/9780203861448
David Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism ,(2005)
Giorgio Agamben, State of Exception ,(2004)
David Winickoff, Lawrence Busch, Brian Wynne, Robin Grove-White, Sheila Jasanoff, Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law. Yale Journal of International Law. ,vol. 30, pp. 3- ,(2005)
Deborah Tippins, Lynn A. Bryan, Michael P. Mueller, The Future of Citizen Science Democracy education. ,vol. 20, pp. 2- ,(2012)
BETTY ACHINSTEIN, RODNEY OGAWA, (In)Fidelity: What the Resistance of New Teachers Reveals about Professional Principles and Prescriptive Educational Policies Harvard Educational Review. ,vol. 76, pp. 30- 63 ,(2006) , 10.17763/HAER.76.1.E14543458R811864
Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life ,(1998)
John Lawrence Bencze, Exposing and Deposing Hyper-Economized School Science. Cultural Studies of Science Education. ,vol. 5, pp. 293- 303 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S11422-010-9256-8
Matthew Weinstein, We are Already Owned: What are the resulting implications if we continue to treat curriculum/teaching theory and practice as separate domains of academic research? Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. ,vol. 4, pp. 54- 60 ,(2007) , 10.1080/15505170.2007.10411623