Overcoming the limits of theodicy: an interactive reciprocal response to evil

作者: John Culp

DOI: 10.1007/S11153-015-9525-2

关键词: PhilosophyReciprocalPhilosophy of religionEpistemologyPostmodernismMoral evilTheodicyPolitical ponerologyOmnipotence

摘要: Recent criticisms of theodicies express a conflict between theoretical and practical responses to the existence evil. Theodicies, defenses, seek provide resolution question why there is evil if God. In providing an answer, offer explanation for that responds in manner. contrast those responses, have been number emphasized acting against These stressed human actions lessen occurrence impact Examining made opens up possibility interaction A survey changing understanding divine omnipotence demonstrates reciprocal leading more comprehensive response God’s relationship

参考文章(22)
Lieven Boeve, The God Who May Be: A Hermeneutics of Religion Ars Disputandi. ,vol. 5, pp. 37- 40 ,(2005) , 10.1080/15665399.2005.10819860
Nicholas Saunders, Divine Action and Modern Science ,(2002)
Kenneth Surin, Theology and the problem of evil ,(1986)
Marilyn McCord Adams, Horrendous evils and the goodness of God ,(1999)
Brian Davies, D. Z. Phillips on God and Evil Philosophical Investigations. ,vol. 35, pp. 317- 330 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1467-9205.2012.01472.X
Marilyn McCord Adams, Ignorance, Instrumentality, Compensation, and the Problem of Evil Sophia. ,vol. 52, pp. 7- 26 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11841-012-0346-9
Hubert L. Dreyfus, The topology of boundaries Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 80, pp. 1- 27 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0004-3702(95)00088-7