Comparing methods of determining addition in presbyopes.

作者: Beatriz Antona , Francisco Barra , Ana Barrio , Angel Gutierrez , Elena Piedrahita

DOI: 10.1111/J.1444-0938.2007.00159.X

关键词: Dynamic retinoscopyRange (statistics)RetinoscopyMathematicsNear pointOpticsPresbyopiaStatisticsAmplitude of accommodationAccommodationPositive relative accommodation

摘要: Background: The use of plus lenses to compensate for the reduction in range accommodation associated with presbyopia, brings near point a comfortable distance visual tasks. Our aim was compare tentative addition determined using most common procedures final prescribed presbyopic patients. Methods: Sixty-nine healthy subjects mean age 51.0 years (range 40 60 years) were studied. Tentative additions seven different techniques: dynamic retinoscopy, amplitude (AA), age-expected addition, binocular fused cross-cylinder and without myopisation, duochrome, balance negative positive relative accommodation. power then refined arrive at addition. Results: higher than every procedure except initial myopisation ageexpected methods. These biases small clinical terms (less 0.25 D) exception AA (0.34 D). intervals between 95% limits agreement differed substantially always ±0.50 D. Conclusions: All techniques used displayed similar behaviour provided close addition. Due wide observed, likelihood error is high supports idea that any has be adjusted according particular needs each patient. Among methods examined here, we would recommend procedure, as this technique produced results correlated best

参考文章(21)
Jackson Tw, Goss Da, Variation and correlation of clinical tests of accommodative function in a sample of school-age children. Journal of the American Optometric Association. ,vol. 62, pp. 857- 866 ,(1991)
Tracey L Yothers, Stephen E Morse, Bruce Wick, Bal-Chuan Jiang, Clinical testing of accommodative facility: Part 1. A critical appraisal of the literature. Optometry - Journal of The American Optometric Association. ,vol. 73, pp. 11- 23 ,(2002)
P A Blystone, Relationship between age and presbyopic addition using a sample of 3,645 examinations from a single private practice. Journal of the American Optometric Association. ,vol. 70, pp. 505- 508 ,(1999)
Nancy B. Carlson, Daniel Kurtz, Clinical Procedures for Ocular Examination ,(1990)
Helen Whitefoot, W. N. Charman, Dynamic retinoscopy and accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. ,vol. 12, pp. 8- 17 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1475-1313.1992.TB00247.X
M ROSENFIELD, Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. ,vol. 16, pp. 247- 249 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0275-5408(95)00093-3
Robert Alexander Weale, Epidemiology of refractive errors and presbyopia Survey of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 48, pp. 515- 543 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0039-6257(03)00086-9
EWEN S. MACMILLAN, DAVID B. ELLIOTT, BHAVESH PATEL, and MICHAEL COX, Loss of visual acuity is the main reason why reading addition increases after the age of sixty. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 78, pp. 381- 385 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00006324-200106000-00009
J. Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman, Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. ,vol. 327, pp. 307- 310 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
MICHAEL W. ROUSE, RICHARD LONDON, DAVID C. ALLEN, An evaluation of the monocular estimate method of dynamic retinoscopy. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 59, pp. 234- 239 ,(1982) , 10.1097/00006324-198203000-00006