Sensitivity of the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk to greenhouse gas metrics

作者: Andy Reisinger , Stewart F. Ledgard , Shelley J. Falconer

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.04.026

关键词: Greenhouse gasEnvironmental resource managementTransparency (graphic)Production (economics)Metric (unit)Carbon footprintEnvironmental scienceCarbon dioxideNatural resource economicsTime horizonEnergy consumption

摘要: Abstract Milk production is responsible for emitting a range of greenhouse gases (GHGs), mainly carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrous oxide (N O) and methane (CH 4 ). In Life Cycle Assessments (LCA), the Global Warming Potential with time horizon 100 years (GWP100) used almost universally to aggregate emissions individual into so-called CO -equivalent that are calculate overall footprint milk production. However, there growing awareness that, depending on purpose LCA, metrics other than GWP100 could be justified some would give very different weighting short-lived gas CH relative long-lived N O when calculating footprint. Pastoral dairy systems at levels intensification differ in balance short- GHGs associated on- off-farm emissions. Differences therefore highly sensitive choice GHG metric. Here we explore extent which alternative metric choices alter New Zealand national, regional farm scales compared selected European countries. We find ranking farms terms their relatively robust against metric, despite significant differences utilisation pastures versus supplementary feed, fertiliser use energy consumption various stages operations. instances where fundamentally change conclusions LCA systems, including whether move towards higher or lower input increase decrease average Zealand. Greater transparency about implications often inadvertent implicit value judgements embedded these metrics, help ensure policy decisions consumer based indeed deliver climate outcomes intended by end-users.

参考文章(23)
Steven J. Smith, M. L. Wigley, Global Warming Potentials: 1. Climatic Implications of Emissions Reductions Climatic Change. ,vol. 44, pp. 445- 457 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1005584914078
Thomas F Stocker, Dahe Qin, G-K Plattner, Melinda MB Tignor, Simon K Allen, Judith Boschung, Alexander Nauels, Yu Xia, Vincent Bex, Pauline M Midgley, Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Published in <b>2007</b> in Cambridge by Cambridge university press. ,(2007) , 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
Alan S. Manne, Richard G. Richels, An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature. ,vol. 410, pp. 675- 677 ,(2001) , 10.1038/35070541
Anna Flysjö, Maria Henriksson, Christel Cederberg, Stewart Ledgard, Jan-Eric Englund, The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 104, pp. 459- 469 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.AGSY.2011.03.003
Claudine Basset-Mens, Francis M. Kelliher, Stewart Ledgard, Neil Cox, Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 14, pp. 630- 638 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11367-009-0108-2
Claudine Basset-Mens, Stewart Ledgard, Mark Boyes, Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand Ecological Economics. ,vol. 68, pp. 1615- 1625 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2007.11.017
Stewart F. Ledgard, Mark Lieffering, Dan Coup, Ben O'Brien, Carbon footprinting of New Zealand lamb from the perspective of an exporting nation Animal Frontiers. ,vol. 1, pp. 40- 45 ,(2011) , 10.2527/AF.2011-0010
Katsumasa Tanaka, Daniel J. A. Johansson, Brian C. O’Neill, Jan S. Fuglestvedt, Emission metrics under the 2 °C climate stabilization target Climatic Change. ,vol. 117, pp. 933- 941 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S10584-013-0693-8