The Logical Framework Approach to Project Design and Management

作者: Rolf H. Sartorius

DOI: 10.1016/0886-1633(91)90005-I

关键词: Political scienceLogical frameworkEngineering managementAccountabilityProgram Design LanguageProject managementProgram evaluationProgram managementLogical framework approachOrganization development

摘要: The aim of this paper is to introduce the Logical Framework (LogFrame) approach project design and management mainstream planners, evaluators, managers discuss some general lessons learned from LogFrame use in international agencies. I then argue that innovations program evaluation practice, emphasizing practical evaluations designed improve programs (Patton, 1986, 1982) combined with new PC/LogFRAME computer software package appropriate training, give excellent potential impact public nonprofit agencies, foundations, corporations. was initially developed for U.S. Agency Intemational Development (USAID) 1970 as an tool help increase accountability Congress. In 1971 USAID undertook a worldwide effort train its field staff on Approach. By late 1970s training had lost momentum languished. 1980s calls accountability, renewed interest approach. A number other multilateral bilateral agencies currently including United Nations Program (UNDP); official German, English, Irish, Belgian, Norwegian, Canadian aid agencies; Asian African Banks; voluntary organizations. related article (Sartorius, 1991) describes organizational development strategy install at Bank.

参考文章(11)
Krishna Kumar, Conducting group interviews in developing countries U.S. Agency for International Development. ,(1987)
Michael Quinn Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation ,(1978)
Basil Cracknell, Evaluating the effectiveness of the Logical Framework system in practice Project appraisal. ,vol. 4, pp. 163- 167 ,(1989) , 10.1080/02688867.1989.9726727
Casley, Dennis J. Kumar, Krishna, Project Monitoring and Evaluation in Agriculture ,(1987)
Ann M. Pflaum, Timothy J. Delmont, External Scanning—A Tool for Planners Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 53, pp. 58- 68 ,(1987) , 10.1080/01944368708976635