Gross greenhouse gas fluxes from hydro-power reservoir compared to thermo-power plants

作者: Marco Aurelio dos Santos , Luiz Pinguelli Rosa , Bohdan Sikar , Elizabeth Sikar , Ednaldo Oliveira dos Santos

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2004.06.015

关键词: Environmental scienceElectricity generationCombined cycleNatural gasGreenhouse gasEnvironmental engineeringHydroelectricityThermal power stationMethanePower station

摘要: Abstract This paper presents the findings of gross carbon dioxide and methane emissions measurements in several Brazilian hydro-reservoirs, compared to thermo power generation. The term ‘gross emissions’ means gas flux from reservoir surface without natural pre-impoundment by bodies such as river channel, seasonal flooding terrestrial ecosystems. net result deducting pre-existing reservoir. A dam emits biogenic gases CO 2 CH 4 . However, studies comparing (gross emissions) with thermo-power generation technologies show that hydro-based option better results most cases analyzed. In this study, were carried Miranda, Barra Bonita, Segredo, Tres Marias, Xingo, Samuel Tucurui reservoirs, located two different climatological regimes. Additional data used here taken at Itaipu Serra da Mesa reservoirs. Comparisons also made between hydro-power plants their thermo-based equivalents. Bearing mind estimated values for include are not totally anthropogenic, studied generally posted lower than equivalent counterparts. Hydro-power complexes greater densities (capacity/area flooded—W/m ), Itaipu, Segredo have best performance, well above using state-of-the-art technology: combined cycle fueled gas, 50% efficiency. On other hand, some low-power density perform only slightly or even worse

参考文章(12)
Luiz Pinguelli Rosa, Roberto Schaeffer, Global warming potentials: The case of emissions from dams Energy Policy. ,vol. 23, pp. 149- 158 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0301-4215(95)91418-C
Roberto Schaeffer, Jeffrey Logan, Alexandre Salem Szklo, William Chandler, João Carlos de Souza Marques, Brazil's Electric Power Choices and Their Corresponding Carbon Emissions Implications Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 47- 69 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011365526243
Robert Delmas, Corinne Galy-Lacaux, Sandrine Richard, Emissions of greenhouse gases from the tropical hydroelectric reservoir of Petit Saut (French Guiana) compared with emissions from thermal alternatives Global Biogeochemical Cycles. ,vol. 15, pp. 993- 1003 ,(2001) , 10.1029/2000GB001330
Michael Keller, Robert F. Stallard, Methane emission by bubbling from Gatun Lake, Panama Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 99, pp. 8307- 8319 ,(1994) , 10.1029/92JD02170
Jeffrey E. Richey, John M. Melack, Anthony K. Aufdenkampe, Victoria M. Ballester, Laura L. Hess, Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2 Nature. ,vol. 416, pp. 617- 620 ,(2002) , 10.1038/416617A
S.K. Hamilton, S.J. Sippel, J.M. Melack, Oxygen depletion and carbon dioxide and methane production in waters of the Pantanal wetland of Brazil Biogeochemistry. ,vol. 30, pp. 115- 141 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF00002727
Karen B. Bartlett, Robert C. Harriss, Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands Chemosphere. ,vol. 26, pp. 261- 320 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0045-6535(93)90427-7
Donatella Schmidt, Hydroelectric Dams on Brazil's Xingu River and Indigenous Peoples Latin American Anthropology Review. ,vol. 4, pp. 14- 15 ,(2008) , 10.1525/JLCA.1992.4.1.14
Allan H. Devol, Jeffrey E. Richey, Wayne A. Clark, Stagg L. King, Luiz A. Martinelli, Methane emissions to the troposphere from the Amazon floodplain Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 93, pp. 1583- 1592 ,(1988) , 10.1029/JD093ID02P01583
Luiz Pinguelli Rosa, Roberto Schaeffer, Marco Aurelio dos Santos, Are hydroelectric dams in the Brazilian Amazon significant sources of ‘greenhouse’ gases? Environmental Conservation. ,vol. 23, pp. 2- 6 ,(1996) , 10.1017/S0376892900038194