Amabile‘s Consensual Assessment Technique: Why Has It Not Been Used more in Design Creativity Research?
作者： Karl K. Jeffries
DOI:
关键词: Mathematics education 、 Creative industries 、 Systematic review 、 Publishing 、 Engineering 、 Creativity 、 Design education 、 Engineering ethics 、 Research design
摘要: Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) has been described as the “gold standard” of creativity assessment; extensively used within research, and is seen most popular method assessing creative outputs. Its discussion scholarly research continued to grow year by year. However, since 1996, a systematic review CAT not undertaken, and, design journals, appears have occurred, in relation design, or more broadly, industries general. Yet, consensus domain judges prevalent methodology for education, professional awards. This paper presents findings from literature covering works 1982 2011. It details key journals authors publishing citing related studies, highlights limited number studies with suggestions why this may be case.
uclan.ac.uk参考文章(29)
Irena Čorko, Andrea Vranić, The Influence of Information about Existing Products in the Specific Domain on the Creativity of New Products Društvena istraživanja : časopis za opća društvena pitanja. ,vol. 16, pp. 613- 625 ,(2007)
Jonathan A. Plucker, James C. Kaufman, John Baer, Essentials of Creativity Assessment ,(2008)
Beth A. Hennessey, Teresa M. Amabile, Margaret Martinage, Immunizing Children against the Negative Effects of Reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology. ,vol. 14, pp. 212- 227 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0361-476X(89)90011-8
Mark Batey, Adrian Furnham, Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs. ,vol. 132, pp. 355- 429 ,(2006) , 10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430
Nigel Cross, Descriptive models of creative design: application to an example Design Studies. ,vol. 18, pp. 427- 440 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00010-0
T. J. Howard, S. Culley, E. A. Dekoninck, Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design Journal of Engineering Design. ,vol. 22, pp. 565- 581 ,(2011) , 10.1080/09544821003598573
Henri Christiaans, Kees Venselaar, Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert International Journal of Technology and Design Education. ,vol. 15, pp. 217- 236 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S10798-004-1904-4
Teresa M. Amabile, Phyllis Goldfarb, Shereen C. Brackfleld, Social Influences on Creativity: Evaluation, Coaction, and Surveillance Creativity Research Journal. ,vol. 3, pp. 6- 21 ,(1990) , 10.1080/10400419009534330
David Cropley, Arthur Cropley, Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education International Journal of Technology and Design Education. ,vol. 20, pp. 345- 358 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10798-009-9089-5
Teresa M. Amabile, Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 43, pp. 997- 1013 ,(1982) , 10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997