Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland
作者： P. Kaparaju , J. Rintala
DOI: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2010.05.016
关键词: Anaerobic digestion 、 Biogas 、 Fertilizer 、 Manure management 、 Greenhouse gas 、 Enteric fermentation 、 Waste management 、 Environmental science 、 Renewable resource 、 Environmental engineering 、 Renewable energy
摘要: Abstract The impact of anaerobic digestion (AD) technology on mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from manure management typical dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland was compared. Firstly, the total annual GHG were calculated using IPCC guidelines for a similar slurry type system. Secondly, laboratory-scale experiments conducted to estimate methane (CH4) potentials process parameters semi-continuous manures. Finally, obtained experimental data used evaluate potential renewable energy production subsequently, possible that could be avoided through adoption AD studied farms. Results showed enteric fermentation (CH4 N2O) accounted 231.3, 32.3 18.3 Mg CO2 eq. yr−1 farms, respectively. With existing farm yields, an estimated 115.2, 36.3 79.5 MWh heat yr−1 62.8, 21.8 47.7 MWh electricity yr−1 could generated CHP plant these offset dairy cow, 177, 87.7 125.6 Mg eq. yr−1, mainly replaced fossil fuel consumption followed by reduced due fertilizer use production, management.
cabdirect.org
elsevier.com
core.ac.uk 
sci-hub.se 参考文章(21)
Pasi K. Mattila, Ammonia emissions from pig and cattle slurry in the field and utilization of slurry nitrogen in crop production Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen. ,(2006)
C.H. Burton, J. Martinez, P.J.L. Derikx, P.F. Bloxham, J. Beck, Manure management: treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture Published in <b>2003</b> in Silsoe by Silsoe Research Institute. ,(1997)
P. Kaparaju, S. Luostarinen, E. Kalmari, J. Kalmari, J. Rintala, Co-digestion of energy crops and industrial confectionery by-products with cow manure: batch-scale and farm-scale evaluation. Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 45, pp. 275- 280 ,(2002) , 10.2166/WST.2002.0352
B. A. Callander, L. G. Meira Filho, John Theodore Houghton, K. Maskell, A. Kattenberg, N. Harris, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change ,(1996)
Jorge Alberto Elizondo-Salazar, Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche Agronomía Mesoamericana. ,vol. 13, pp. 41- 44 ,(2014) , 10.15517/AM.V13I1.13244
Andrew Eaton, A.E. Greenberg, Lenore S. Clesceri, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater Published in <b>1998</b> in Washington DC) by American public health association. ,(1992)
T. Yan, C.S. Mayne, M.G. Porter, Effects of dietary and animal factors on methane production in dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets International Congress Series. ,vol. 1293, pp. 123- 126 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.ICS.2006.02.024
S. Chen, Z. Wen, W. Liao, C. Liu, R. L. Kincaid, J. H. Harrison, D. C. Elliott, M. D. Brown, D. J. Stevens, Studies into using manure in a biorefinery concept. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. ,vol. 124, pp. 999- 1015 ,(2005) , 10.1385/ABAB:124:1-3:0999
Thomas Amon, Barbara Amon, Vitaliy Kryvoruchko, Werner Zollitsch, Karl Mayer, Leonhard Gruber, Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 118, pp. 173- 182 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2006.05.007
Prasad Kaparaju, Jukka Rintala, Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure Resources Conservation and Recycling. ,vol. 43, pp. 175- 188 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2004.06.001