Choice Between Fluorescent and Poultry-Specific LED Lights by Pullets and Laying Hens

作者: Kai Liu , Hongwei Xin , Lilong Chai

DOI: 10.13031/TRANS.12402

关键词: LayingBiologyFluorescent lightBreedPreference testPreference assessmentAnimal science

摘要: Light plays an important role in poultry development, production performance, health, and well-being. technology continues to advance, accordingly new light products are finding applications operations. However, research concerning responses of young adult laying hens sources is relatively lacking. This study assessed the choice between a Dim-to-Red poultry-specific light-emitting diode (LED) (PS-LED, correlated color temperature or CCT = 2000K) warm-white fluorescent (FL, 2700K) by pullets (W-36 breed) via preference test. Birds with different prior lighting experiences were evaluated for their choice, including (1) (14 16 weeks age WOA) reared under incandescent (designated as PINC), (2) layers (44 50 PS-LED (LLED) throughout pullet phases, (3) FL (LFL) phases. Each bird category consisted 12 replicates, three birds per replicate. replicate involved 6-day test, during which could move freely two interconnected compartments that contained FL, respectively. Time spent feed intake each measured then analyzed generalized linear mixed models. Results showed regardless experience, all cases stronger (p 0.001 0.030), evidenced higher proportions time it. Specifically, proportion (mean ±SEM) versus was 58.0% ±2.9% vs. 42.0% PINC, 53.7% ±1.6% 46.3% LLED, 54.2% ±1.2% 45.8% LFL. daily occurring comparable 0.419 0.749). The thus reveals experience did not affect PS-LED. While exhibited somewhat this tendency translate into differences use type.

参考文章(47)
H Ma, H Xin, Y Zhao, B Li, TA Shepherd, I Alvarez, None, Assessment of lighting needs by W-36 laying hens via preference test. Animal. ,vol. 10, pp. 671- 680 ,(2016) , 10.1017/S1751731115002384
A. Valros, S. Gunnarsson, A. Briese, A. Springorum, M. Clauss, J. Hartung, Effect of enrichment, day length and natural versus artificial light on behaviour and light preference in layer chicks. Sustainable animal husbandry: prevention is better than cure, Volume 1. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of the International Society for Animal Hygiene (ISAH), Vechta, Germany, 19th to 23rd July 2009. pp. 345- 348 ,(2009)
Innes C. Cuthill, Julian C. Partridge, Andrew T.D. Bennett, Stuart C. Church, Nathan S. Hart, Sarah Hunt, Ultraviolet Vision in Birds Advances in The Study of Behavior. ,vol. 29, pp. 159- 214 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60105-9
Christopher M. Wathes, John Jarvis, N.B. Prescott, Light, vision and the welfare of poultry Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. ,(2003)
D. Osorio, M. Vorobyev, A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals Vision Research. ,vol. 48, pp. 2042- 2051 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.VISRES.2008.06.018
Richard B D’Eath, Linda J Keeling, None, Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: from peck orders to social tolerance Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 84, pp. 197- 212 ,(2003) , 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2003.08.010
P.D. Lewis, T.R. Morris, Poultry and coloured light Worlds Poultry Science Journal. ,vol. 56, pp. 189- 207 ,(2000) , 10.1079/WPS20000015
Michael C. Appleby, Helen E. McRae, Beate E. Peitz, The effect of light on the choice of nests by domestic hens Applied Animal Ethology. ,vol. 11, pp. 249- 254 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0304-3762(84)90031-2