作者: Harpreet Sangha , David Lipson , Norine Foley , Katherine Salter , Sanjit Bhogal
DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00006
关键词: Clinical trial 、 Randomized controlled trial 、 Activities of daily living 、 Physical therapy 、 Physical medicine and rehabilitation 、 Functional Independence Measure 、 MEDLINE 、 Stroke 、 Scale (social sciences) 、 Medicine 、 Rehabilitation
摘要: In order to compare the frequency and patterns of use Barthel Index (BI) Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in stroke rehabilitation trials, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1968 2002 were identified reviewed determine with which BI FIM measures used relative other disability. The date location each study citing either or also recorded. Studies assigned ratings methodological quality based on physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scoring system. Comparisons age, continents origin studies explored. Results indicate that most common disability RCTs examining rehabilitation. However, was more often than (n=86, P<0.001) cited superior (P=0.005). from North America likely compared European (n=24, P<0.001). Publications significantly recent when originating Europe as opposed (P=0.023). These results provide insight into current scale research.