A comparison of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure as outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: patterns of disability scale usage in clinical trials.

作者: Harpreet Sangha , David Lipson , Norine Foley , Katherine Salter , Sanjit Bhogal

DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200506000-00006

关键词: Clinical trialRandomized controlled trialActivities of daily livingPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationFunctional Independence MeasureMEDLINEStrokeScale (social sciences)MedicineRehabilitation

摘要: In order to compare the frequency and patterns of use Barthel Index (BI) Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in stroke rehabilitation trials, all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1968 2002 were identified reviewed determine with which BI FIM measures used relative other disability. The date location each study citing either or also recorded. Studies assigned ratings methodological quality based on physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scoring system. Comparisons age, continents origin studies explored. Results indicate that most common disability RCTs examining rehabilitation. However, was more often than (n=86, P<0.001) cited superior (P=0.005). from North America likely compared European (n=24, P<0.001). Publications significantly recent when originating Europe as opposed (P=0.023). These results provide insight into current scale research.

参考文章(20)
Tina Magennis, The Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation: the role of the health information manager. Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia. ,vol. 24, pp. 55- 57 ,(1994) , 10.1177/183335839402400206
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, Yungwen Hsu, Carl V. Granger, Roger C. Fiedler, The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 77, pp. 1226- 1232 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90184-7
Michelle E. Cohen, Ralph J. Marino, The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 81, ,(2000) , 10.1053/APMR.2000.20620
Wilton H. Bunch, Victoria M. Dvonch, The value' of functional independence measure scores American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. ,vol. 73, pp. 40- 43 ,(1994) , 10.1097/00002060-199402000-00010
Haim Ring, Monica Feder, Julia Schwartz, Guita Samuels, Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the Functional Independence Measure total score with a clinical rationale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 78, pp. 630- 635 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90429-9
Janice L. Hinkle, The Use of the FIM™ Instrument in the Poststroke Population Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. ,vol. 7, pp. 47- 66 ,(2000) , 10.1310/3LB6-CGVN-EAAU-0TEQ
Anne M Moseley, Robert D Herbert, Catherine Sherrington, Christopher G Maher, Evidence for Physiotherapy Practice: A Survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) The Australian journal of physiotherapy. ,vol. 48, pp. 43- 49 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60281-6
Eugene Moskowitz, Mount Vernon, Cairbre B. McCann, Classification of disability in the chronically ill and aging. Journal of Chronic Diseases. ,vol. 5, pp. 342- 346 ,(1957) , 10.1016/0021-9681(57)90092-9
Sidney Katz, C. A. Akpom, 12. Index of ADL. Medical Care. ,vol. 14, pp. 116- 118 ,(1976) , 10.1097/00005650-197605001-00018
FM Nouri, NB Lincoln, An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients Clinical Rehabilitation. ,vol. 1, pp. 301- 305 ,(1987) , 10.1177/026921558700100409