Thinking about Forgiveness: A Philosophical Preamble to its Cultivation in Schooling

作者: Douglas Stewart

DOI: 10.2307/JTHOUGHT.47.1.66

关键词: ArgumentEpistemologyHuman conditionSociologyForgivenessContext (language use)Interpersonal communicationFaithFlourishingValue (ethics)

摘要: In this article I explore and clarify issues fundamental to an understanding of forgiveness its justification. do so as a necessary preliminary related project falling beyond the scope present study, one that will examine idea nurturing culture or spirit in public (state) schooling from wider more inclusive perspective than what has been typically advanced educational literature, (2) might entail, why those directly concerned with should take cultivation forgiving attitudes dispositions seriously. This work is divided into three sections. The first identifies be central features characteristics "forgiveness" insofar morally relevant uses are concerned. (3) Some these formal nature, others substantive. Most presented relatively moderate analysis argument, none exactly new sense not having discussed philosophical literature on before, though my selection treatment may vary at times others. second section examines reasons grounds which act extending defended, well conditions under limited, inappropriate, objectionable. final briefly some questions for further study raises respect practice schooling. Forgiveness complex contestable notion, easily given popular misconception, e.g., it returns situation between two parties back normal, lets culprits "off hook" condones they do, much derision, only weak, sentimental, religious, smacks new-age "mushiness," on. Yet extremely powerful idea, critical human condition, our vulnerabilities, fallibilities, capacities doing both good ill. How we see respond whose words deeds hurt wrong us way? ourselves when own thoughts self-damaging self-deceiving, say things regret? What role play flourishing beings, becoming persons fully and, consequently, basic purpose (or ought be) preparation students lead lives possible? (4) focus primarily interpersonal rather self-forgiveness social-political forgiveness. (5) Interpersonal seems particularly contexts have mind, withstanding importance value other two. My approach secular-philosophical religious theological one. Hannah Arendt once opined modern societies tend overlook under-estimate because was "presumed purely matter" (in Govier, 2002, pp. 42-43). taking acknowledge multicultural character liberal democratic society, separation church state reflected (as distinct faith-based) schooling, rational belief order forgive seek need person faith any moral faith. A transcendent reality, words, presupposition forgiving, history least context Western civilization closely associated such reality. (6) follow (e.g., Holmgren,1993; 2002; Roberts-Cady, 2003; Wolfendale, 2005) generally sympathetic Kantian ethic ability provide underpinning forgiveness, (7) secular basis advanced. …

参考文章(21)
Trudy Govier, Forgiveness and revenge ,(2002)
Jean Hampton, Forgiveness and mercy: Forgiveness, resentment and hatred Cambridge University Press. pp. 35- 87 ,(1988) , 10.1017/CBO9780511625121.004
Desmond Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness ,(1999)
John Langshaw Austin, How to do things with words ,(1962)
Hagit Benbaji, David Heyd, The Charitable Perspective: Forgiveness and Toleration as Supererogatory Canadian Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 31, pp. 567- 586 ,(2001) , 10.1080/00455091.2001.10717580
Kathleen Gill, The Moral Functions of an Apology The Philosophical Forum. ,vol. 31, pp. 11- 27 ,(2000) , 10.1111/0031-806X.00025
Bruce Lloyd, Rushworth M. Kidder, Ethics for the new millennium Leadership & Organization Development Journal. ,vol. 18, pp. 145- 148 ,(1997) , 10.1108/01437739710168625