Skin closure after laparotomy with staples or sutures: a study of the mature scar

作者: Jeremy W. Simcock , Jon Armitage , Liane Dixon , Kim MacFarlane , Greg M. Robertson

DOI: 10.1111/ANS.12257

关键词: LaparotomyScar assessmentColorectal surgeryMedicineMature scarAbdominal surgerySurgeryWound healingVascularityScarsGeneral Medicine

摘要: Background Surgeons are divided in their method of choice for skin closure following laparotomy. We suggest that the most important determinant should be resulting scar. This study aims to compare both patients' and independent observers' assessment mature laparotomy scars had been closed with either subcuticular sutures or external staples. Methods Consecutive patients were enrolled at least 1 year colorectal surgery. Scars assessed validated Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scoring (POSAS) tool. Photographs by a blinded panel. Results Overall, 232 (90 suture, 143 staples). The two groups well matched factors affecting wound healing. Patients' overall opinion scar was significantly better Suture group than Staples (P = 0.028) despite there being no difference self-assessment components score (pain, itch, colour, stiffness, thickness, irregularity). panel recorded similar scores (P = 0.059). There significant lower (better) area component (P = 0.008) but differences other (vascularity, pigmentation thickness). Discussion This has shown method, who have undergone major abdominal surgery positive scars. impression favours sutured due smaller (no staple marks). In all respects, staples would appear acceptable.

参考文章(9)
D. Gatt, C. R. Quick, M. S. Owen-Smith, Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. ,vol. 67, pp. 318- 320 ,(1985)
Annekatrien L. van de Kar, Leonard U. M. Corion, Mark J. C. Smeulders, Lieneke J. Draaijers, Chantal M. A. M. van der Horst, Paul P. M. van Zuijlen, Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 116, pp. 514- 522 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.PRS.0000172982.43599.D6
C. J. Ranaboldo, D. C. Rowe-Jones, Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 79, pp. 1172- 1173 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800791122
David Lubowski, David Hunt, ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE COMPARING THE PROXIMATE STAPLER WITH SUTURES Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 55, pp. 405- 406 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.1985.TB00910.X
James Nicklin, Andreas Obermair, Alex Crandon, Lewis Perrin, Tom Walsh, Marcelo Carrazo, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SKIN CLOSURE AFTER LAPAROTOMY FOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY Anz Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 77, pp. 460- 463 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.2007.04095.X
Martijn B. A. van der Wal, Wim E. Tuinebreijer, Monica C. T. Bloemen, Pauline D. H. M. Verhaegen, Esther Middelkoop, Paul P. M. van Zuijlen, Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars. Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 13- 23 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S11136-011-9924-5
Nuh N Rahbari, Phillip Knebel, Markus K Diener, Christoph Seidlmayer, Karsten Ridwelski, Hartmut Stöltzing, Christoph M Seiler, Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus? BMC Surgery. ,vol. 9, pp. 8- 8 ,(2009) , 10.1186/1471-2482-9-8
T. O Smith, D. Sexton, C. Mann, S. Donell, Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis BMJ. ,vol. 340, ,(2010) , 10.1136/BMJ.C1199
Alon D. Altman, Victoria M. Allen, Shelly A. McNeil, Jeffrey Dempster, Pfannenstiel Incision Closure: A Review of Current Skin Closure Techniques Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada. ,vol. 31, pp. 514- 520 ,(2009) , 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34213-X