Selection of optimal scales for soil depth prediction on headwater hillslopes: A modeling approach

作者: Xiaole Han , Jintao Liu , Subhasis Mitra , Xiaopeng Li , Puneet Srivastava

DOI: 10.1016/J.CATENA.2017.12.026

关键词: Soil waterElevationCoefficient of determinationGround-penetrating radarLandformGeologySoil scienceLinear regressionTerrainDigital elevation model

摘要: Abstract Landform attributes derived from digital elevation models (DEMs) are the most commonly used factors to predict soil depths on hillslopes. However, selection of an appropriate algorithm calculate terrain and identify optimal DEM resolution remains ambiguous. In this study, we propose a method use high-resolution spatial depth data obtain at hillslope scales. A geophysical (ground penetrating radar, GPR) was investigate reasons for findings. Point-scale 116 sites were collected two adjacent headwater hillslopes (H1: 0.42 ha H2: 0.31 ha) Hemuqiao hydrological experimental station in Southeast China. The datasets using total variable spacing level then DEMs nine resolutions: 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 2.00, 3.50, 5.00, 7.50 10.00 m. Nine primary secondary topographic derived. Two different algorithms (D8 D ∞) calculating contributing areas related compared. We compared both linear (multiple regression, MLR) non-linear (artificial neural network, ANN) prediction. Results demonstrated that performed well predicting depth. Specifically, MLR better than model ANNs. Additionally, found multiple-direction (D ∞) allowed flow divergence avoided abrupt changes predictions (orphan cells) should be adopted construction. D ∞ divergent areas, such as ridges side slopes, also worked convergent valleys. Moreover, our results moderate (e.g., 2.00 m) attributes, instead finest resolution, achieved best prediction with lowest root mean square error (RMSE) absolute (MAE) highest values coefficient determination (R2). GPR indicated valley accumulated more soils side-slope sharp increase valley. Comparing width obtained by GPR, average (AVW) considered good measure choosing

参考文章(55)
Mohsen BAGHERI BODAGHABADI, JoséAntonio MARTÍNEZ-CASASNOVAS, Mohammad Hasan SALEHI, Jahangard MOHAMMADI, Isa ESFANDIARPOOR BORUJENI, Norair TOOMANIAN, Amir GANDOMKAR, Digital Soil Mapping Using Artificial Neural Networks and Terrain-Related Attributes Pedosphere. ,vol. 25, pp. 580- 591 ,(2015) , 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30038-2
R. Wojtasinski, R. W. Johnson, R. Glaccum, Application of ground penetrating radar to soil survey. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida Proceedings. ,vol. 39, pp. 68- 72 ,(1980)
Arjun M. Heimsath, William E. Dietrich, Kunihiko Nishiizumi, Robert C. Finkel, The soil production function and landscape equilibrium Nature. ,vol. 388, pp. 358- 361 ,(1997) , 10.1038/41056
Robert H. Erskine, Timothy R. Green, Jorge A. Ramirez, Lee H. MacDonald, Comparison of grid-based algorithms for computing upslope contributing area Water Resources Research. ,vol. 42, ,(2006) , 10.1029/2005WR004648
KJ Beven, MJ Kirkby, A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology Hydrological Sciences Bulletin. ,vol. 24, pp. 43- 69 ,(1979)
Jon D. Pelletier, Craig Rasmussen, Geomorphically based predictive mapping of soil thickness in upland watersheds Water Resources Research. ,vol. 45, ,(2009) , 10.1029/2008WR007319
Jintao Liu, Xi Chen, Xingnan Zhang, Kyle D. Hoagland, Grid digital elevation model based algorithms for determination of hillslope width functions through flow distance transforms Water Resources Research. ,vol. 48, ,(2012) , 10.1029/2011WR011395
Kevin Leempoel, Christian Parisod, Céline Geiser, Lucas Daprà, Pascal Vittoz, Stéphane Joost, Very high‐resolution digital elevation models: are multi‐scale derived variables ecologically relevant? Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 6, pp. 1373- 1383 ,(2015) , 10.1111/2041-210X.12427
Zhiyong Fu, Zhaoxia Li, Chongfa Cai, Zhihua Shi, Qinxue Xu, Xiaoyan Wang, Soil thickness effect on hydrological and erosion characteristics under sloping lands: A hydropedological perspective Geoderma. ,vol. 167, pp. 41- 53 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2011.08.013