Where are virtues

摘要: This paper argues that the question, ‘where are virtues?’ demands a response from virtue theorists. Despite polarizing nature of debates about relevance empirical work in psychology for theory, I first show there is widespread agreement underlying structure virtue. Namely, virtues comprised cognitive and affective processes. Next, well-developed arguments processes can extend beyond agent. Then, similarly then introduce three cases to establish these relevantly similar countenanced by plausible theories Finally, conclude theorists must abandon default internalism, (often implicit) view comprising internal