PREFERENCE FOR INTERMITTENT REINFORCEMENT1

作者: Stephen B. Kendall

DOI: 10.1901/JEAB.1974.21-463

关键词: Peck (Imperial)PsychologyTimeoutDelay DurationStatisticsUncorrelatedReinforcementSocial psychologyReinforcement schedulesWhite light

摘要: Two experiments were conducted demonstrating that under certain conditions pigeons may peck at a higher rate on key produces intermittent reinforcement following delay than one always the same duration. In both experiments, concurrent chain schedules employed. Experiment I, single led to white light and of 15 sec, which terminated with food. A other its illumination by two colored lights period sec. The was followed either food presentation or timeout, lasting 3 control group, this not correlated timeout. Under stimuli, birds more often pecked leading reinforcement, whereas uncorrelated stimuli they 100% reinforcement. II, variable-interval employed in first link. results showed generally relative when timeout There some indication performance affected (1) duration delay, (2) percentage yielding (the light), (3) prior experimental conditions.

参考文章(16)
Abraham A. Spevack, Milton D. Suboski, A confounding of conditioned suppression in passive avoidance: ECS effects Psychonomic science. ,vol. 9, pp. 23- 24 ,(1967) , 10.3758/BF03330740
R. N. Wilson, R. O. Clements, The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 16, pp. 161- 166 ,(1971) , 10.1901/JEAB.1971.16-161
R. N. Wilton, R. O. Clements, Observing responses and informative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 15, pp. 199- 204 ,(1971) , 10.1901/JEAB.1971.15-199
JACK D. FINDLEY, Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 1, pp. 123- 144 ,(1958) , 10.1901/JEAB.1958.1-123
Norman E. Spear, Joseph H. Spitzner, PRE within Ss: Conventional effect on differential speeds, reverse effect on choices Psychonomic science. ,vol. 7, pp. 99- 100 ,(1967) , 10.3758/BF03328483
R. J. Herrnstein, SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT1 Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 27- 36 ,(1964) , 10.1901/JEAB.1964.7-27
James S. McMichael, John T. Lanzetta, James M. Driscoll, Infrequent reward facilitates observing responses in rats Psychonomic science. ,vol. 8, pp. 23- 24 ,(1967) , 10.3758/BF03330648
A. Charles Catania, Behavioral contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 4, pp. 335- 342 ,(1961) , 10.1901/JEAB.1961.4-335
Michael D. Zeiler, Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 17, pp. 177- 189 ,(1972) , 10.1901/JEAB.1972.17-177