Herbivores and pathogens on willow: do they affect each other?

作者: Matthias Simon , Monika Hilker

DOI: 10.1046/J.1461-9563.2003.00189.X

关键词: BiologyMelampsoraPlagioderaRustLarvaHerbivoreWillowAgronomyPlagiodera versicoloraLeaf beetle

摘要: 1 Willows often need to cope with attack by both rust fungi and herbivores. We studied whether infection on willow affects the herbivore, vice versa, herbivore feeding fungal infection. The system investigated laboratory bioassays greenhouse experiments consisted of hybrid Salix × cuspidata, Melampsora allii-fragilis leaf beetle Plagiodera versicolora. Effects were a local scale (rust same leaf) systemically different, but adjacent leaves). 2 Rust was not affected scale. Systemically, however, willow's susceptibility towards increased feeding, as indicated higher number sori leaves feeding-damaged leaves. herbivore's performance detrimentally infection: increase mortality (systemically), decrease larval weight (locally systemically) prolonging developmental time systemically). 3 Previous enhanced subsequent Previous had no effects mortality. However, upon previously significantly reduced weight.

参考文章(49)
K. Renner, The relation between food consumption, body weight and the stage of development in Gastroidea viridula Deg. (Col. Chrysomelidae). Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde und Pflanzenschutz. ,vol. 43, pp. 119- 122 ,(1970)
Paul Feeny, Plant apparency and chemical defense Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 40 ,(1976) , 10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_1
M.J. Stout, A.L. Fidantsef, S.S. Duffey, R.M. Bostock, Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: Systemic plant-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. ,vol. 54, pp. 115- 130 ,(1999) , 10.1006/PMPP.1998.0193
Richard M. Bostock, Richard Karban, Jennifer S. Thaler, Philip D. Weyman, David Gilchrist, Signal Interactions in Induced Resistance to Pathogens and Insect Herbivores European Journal of Plant Pathology. ,vol. 107, pp. 103- 111 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1008703904253
R.M. BOSTOCK, Signal conflicts and synergies in induced resistance to multiple attackers Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. ,vol. 55, pp. 99- 109 ,(1999) , 10.1006/PMPP.1999.0218
IaiN. S. Williams, Slow‐growth, high‐mortality – a general hypothesis, or is it? Ecological Entomology. ,vol. 24, pp. 490- 495 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1365-2311.1999.00217.X
Ari-Pekka Huhta, Tommy Lennartsson, Juha Tuomi, Pasi Rautio, Kari Laine, Tolerance of Gentianella campestris in relation to damage intensity: an interplay between apical dominance and herbivory Evolutionary Ecology. ,vol. 14, pp. 373- 392 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1011028722860
M.C. Heath, D. Skalamera, Cellular Interactions between Plants and Biotrophic Fungal Parasites Advances in Botanical Research. ,vol. 24, pp. 195- 225 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60074-9
Erich Kombrink, Imre E. Somssich, Defense Responses of Plants to Pathogens Advances in Botanical Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 1- 34 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60007-5
A.L. Fidantsef, M.J. Stout, J.S. Thaler, S.S. Duffey, R.M. Bostock, Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: expression of lipoxygenase, proteinase inhibitor II, and pathogenesis-related protein P4 in the tomato,Lycopersicon esculentum Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. ,vol. 54, pp. 97- 114 ,(1999) , 10.1006/PMPP.1998.0192