Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength‐related Attitude Attributes

作者: Penny S. Visser , George Y. Bizer , Jon A. Krosnick

DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38001-X

关键词: Universe (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)Chaotic environmentConceptualizationPsychologySocial psychologyAttitude strengthConstruct (philosophy)Latent structureSet (psychology)

摘要: Some attitudes are durable and impactful, whereas others weak inconsequential. Over the last few decades, researchers have identified roughly a dozen attributes of that differentiate strong from weak. However, considerable controversy remains regarding relations among these attributes. scholars suggested various strength‐related reflect small number latent constructs, each is distinct construct in its own right. We review this ongoing controversy, we then diverse set recent studies provide new evidence support latter perspective. consider implications our findings for conceptualization attitude strength methods by which it studied. Attitudes determine individual what he [or she] will see hear, think do …. They draw lines about, segregate, an otherwise chaotic environment; they finding way about ambiguous universe. —Gordon W. Allport, 1935, p. 806

参考文章(157)
George Comstock, Public communication and behavior Academic Press. ,(1986)
Clyde Hendrick, Margaret Sydnor Clark, Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology ,(1990)
Daniel Todd Gilbert, Susan T Fiske, Gardner Lindzey, The Handbook of Social Psychology ,(1985)
Susan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, Gardner Lindzey, Handbook of social psychology ,(1935)
Bernard Silverman, John Clement Maloney, Attitude research plays for high stakes University Microfilms International. ,(1979)
Geoffrey Paull, Denis Glencross, Expert perception and decision making in baseball. International Journal of Sport Psychology. ,vol. 28, pp. 35- 56 ,(1997)
Brian M. Foss, New Horizons in Psychology 1 ,(1966)
David A. Kenny, Correlation and causality ,(1979)
Russell H. Fazio, Mark P. Zanna, Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 14, pp. 161- 202 ,(1981) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X