Endoscopic vs. Open Carpal Tunnel Release
作者： Jilsa Sucheendran , Balagopalan K , Vinesh Senan , Manesh Senan
DOI:
关键词: Medicine 、 Common disease 、 Treatment options 、 Carpal tunnel release 、 Surgery 、 Endoscopic carpal tunnel release 、 Carpal tunnel syndrome 、 Open group 、 Carpal tunnel 、 Thickened scars
摘要: Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is a common disease affecting Indian patients. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release new technique of treatment for this disease. To study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages endoscopic open release. Materials methods: Open was performed in 40 patients 35 who had clinical signs symptoms consistent with syndrome. They  not responded or refused non operative management  Nerve conduction studies Syndrome. Follow-up evaluations were at one week , 3 weeks 6 months. During follow up period both showed similar results. The syndrome relieved 39 (98 per cent) hands group compared 34 (97 group.The post op pain graded from 0 10. Patients grades below 5 averaged 79 cent open-release 89 that Results: Thirty-two (80 20 (57 endoscopic-release tender 1 week. 25 10 weeks. while group. hand thickened scars no scar months group. The method also resulted longer interval until patient could return work (twenty days vs ten groups). Conclusion: This shows two portal better option will become more popular when surgeons well trained doing technique.
kjoonline.org 参考文章(28)
Dorothy P. Rice, Andrea N. Kopstein, Thomas A. Hodgson, The economic costs of illness: a replication and update. Health Care Financing Review. ,vol. 7, pp. 61- 80 ,(1985)
GEORGE S. PHALEN, The carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 48, pp. 211- 228 ,(1966) , 10.2106/00004623-196648020-00001
G PFEFFER, R GELBERMAN, J BOYES, B RYDEVIK, The History of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 13, pp. 28- 34 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0266-7681(88)90046-0
Harris Gellman, Darryl Kan, Valerie Gee, Stuart H. Kuschner, Michael J. Botte, Analysis of pinch and grip strength after carpal tunnel release Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 14, pp. 863- 864 ,(1989) , 10.1016/S0363-5023(89)80091-7
John M. Agee, H. Relton McCarroll, Richard D. Tortosa, Donald A. Berry, Robert M. Szabo, Clayton A. Peimer, Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 17, pp. 987- 995 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0363-5023(09)91044-9
Michael I. Kulick, Gayle Gordillo, Termeh Javidi, Eugene S. Kilgore, William L. Newmeyer, Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 11, pp. 59- 66 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0363-5023(86)80104-6
George S. Phalen, Reflections on 21 Years' Experience With the Carpal-Tunnel Syndrome JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 212, pp. 1365- 1367 ,(1970) , 10.1001/JAMA.1970.03170210069012
E. L. Kaplan, Paul Meier, Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 53, pp. 319- 337 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25
STEPHAN ARIYAN, H KIRK WATSON, None, The palmar approach for the visualization and release of the carpal tunnel. An analysis of 429 cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 60, pp. 539- 547 ,(1977) , 10.1097/00006534-197710000-00007
MARK KORIS, RICHARD H. GELBERMAN, KENNETH DUNCAN, MARTIN BOUBLICK, BETH SMITH, Carpal tunnel syndrome. Evaluation of a quantitative provocational diagnostic test. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 251, pp. 157- 161 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00003086-199002000-00025