Is a Viable Theistic Program of Psychological Research Possible

作者: Michael Zhang

DOI:

关键词: Qualitative researchTheismNatural (music)Set (psychology)MonopolyEpistemologyNaturalismPsychological researchSocial psychologyConventional wisdomPsychology

摘要: Is a Viable Theistic Program of Psychological Research Possible? Michael Zhang Department Psychology, BYU Master Science This thesis explores whether viable theistic program psychological research is possible. The importance this exploration has to do with naturalism's bad monopoly on science, inasmuch as naturalism prevents other worldviews from competing fairly in psychology’s scientific marketplace by controlling the criteria science. Because theism most complete rival, considering theism's potential psychology crucial dismantling monopoly. Contrary conventional wisdom, encompasses unique set understandings about natural events that constitute discipline psychology. Therefore, robust conception would change how researchers understand and utilize existing methods topics. Not only are quantitative qualitative capable deployment; traditionally topics radically secular within can also be reconceptualized investigated theistically. Indeed, reconceptualizations theories lead new different questions, hypotheses, predictions well original studies prospective programs research, suggesting heuristic for its current constitution. A not possible, but necessary

参考文章(103)
Jeffrey Charles Elliott, Humility: Development and analysis of a scale ,(2010)
M. Elizabeth Lewis Hall, Richard Langer, Jason Mcmartin, The role of suffering in human flourishing : contributions from positive psychology, theology, and philosophy Journal of Psychology and Theology. ,vol. 38, pp. 111- 121 ,(2010) , 10.1177/009164711003800204
Marek Krzystanek, Irena Krupka-Matuszczyk, Adam Klasik, Krzysztof Krysta, Religious content of hallucinations in paranoid schizophrenia. Psychiatria Danubina. ,(2012)
Jeffrey S. Reber, Secular Psychology: What'S the Problem?: Journal of Psychology and Theology. ,vol. 34, pp. 193- 204 ,(2006) , 10.1177/009164710603400302
Brent D. Slife, Matthew Whoolery, Are Psychology'S Main Methods Biased against the Worldview of Many Religious People? Journal of Psychology and Theology. ,vol. 34, pp. 217- 231 ,(2006) , 10.1177/009164710603400304
James M. Nelson, Hermeneutics and Dialogue as Tools toward Integration: Babies and Bathwater, Problems and Solutions Journal of Psychology and Theology. ,vol. 34, pp. 276- 279 ,(2006) , 10.1177/009164710603400311
Brent D. Slife, Tiffani D. Stevenson, Dennis C. Wendt, Including God in Psychotherapy: Strong Vs. Weak Theism: Journal of Psychology and Theology. ,vol. 38, pp. 163- 174 ,(2010) , 10.1177/009164711003800301
Charles Taylor, A Secular Age ,(2007)