Climate Change And The Economics Of Targeted Mitigation In Sectors With Long-Lived Capital Stock

作者: Zmarak Shalizi , Franck Lecocq

DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-5063

关键词: Carbon taxCarbon financeEconomicsNatural resource economicsEnergy securityClimate change mitigationEnergy sourceEconomies of scaleTransport engineeringExternalityPrice signal

摘要: Mitigation investments in long-lived capital stock (LLKS) differ from other types of mitigation that, once established, LLKS can lock-in a stream emissions for extended periods time. Moreover, historical examples industrial countries suggest that projects or networks tend to be lumpy, and generate significant indirect induced besides direct emissions. Looking forward, urbanization rapid economic growth similar decisions about are being will soon made many developing countries. In their current form, carbon markets do not provide correct incentives because the constraint on extends only 2012, does extend Targeted programs regions sectors which is built at rate thus necessary avoid getting locked into highly carbon-intensive LLKS. Even if were (geographically, sectorally, over time), public intervention would still required, three main reasons. First, ensure associated with taken account investor’s financial cost-benefit analysis. Second, facilitate project network financing bridge gap between revenues accrue time as project/network unfolds needed upfront finance lumpy investments. Third, internalize non-carbon externalities (e.g., local pollution) and/or lift barriers lack capacity handle new technologies) penalize low-carbon alternatives relative high-carbon ones.

参考文章(32)
B. Netz, L. A. Meyer, P. R. Bosch, O. R. Davidson, R. Dave, Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers.. ,(2007)
Avinash K. Dixit, Joseph E. Stiglitz, Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity The American Economic Review. ,vol. 67, pp. 302- 304 ,(1977) , 10.22004/AG.ECON.268957
Raymond Kopp, Richard Morgenstern, William Pizer, Michael Toman, A Proposal for Credible Early Action in US Climate Policy ZEW Economic Studies. pp. 127- 130 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-3-642-57691-1_13
C. Henry, Investment decision under uncertainty, The irreversibility effect The American Economic Review. ,vol. 64, pp. 1006- 1012 ,(1974)
M. Ha-Duong, M. J. Grubb, J.-C. Hourcade, Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement Nature. ,vol. 390, pp. 270- 273 ,(1997) , 10.1038/36825
Stan J. Liebowitz, Stephen E. Margolis, Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History Social Science Research Network. ,(1995) , 10.2139/SSRN.1706450
Christine Kessides, John Besant-Jones, Lant Pritchett, Antonio Estache, Gregory K. Ingram, Ashoka Mody, Peter Lanjouw, World development report 1994 : infrastructure for development ULB Institutional Repository. pp. 1- 179 ,(1994)
W.Michael Hanemann, Information and the concept of option value Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 16, pp. 23- 37 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90042-9