Robustness of the spatial insurance effects of biodiversity to habitat loss

作者: Bronwyn Rayfield , Patrick L. Thompson , Andrew Gonzalez

DOI:

关键词: EcologyBiologyBetweenness centralityHabitatBiodiversityMetacommunityEnvironmental resource managementHabitat fragmentationSpatial ecologyBiological dispersalHabitat destruction

摘要: Definitions: Spatial insurance: Improvement of maintenance species diversity and ecosystem functioning in heterogeneous environments because can track their optimal by dispersing between habitat patches. Betweenness centrality: Value an individual patch adding to the connectivity metacommunity being a stepping-stone for individuals. Robustness: The proportion patches that must be removed change each response variable beyond given threshold. Question: In fragmented landscapes, how do spatial patterns loss affect robustness insurance effects on biodiversity? Does underlying pattern metacommunities play role maintaining biodiversity function face loss? Mathematical method: Using spatially explicit version resource competition model, we simulated networks composed connected links dispersal. Key assumptions: Species differ environmental preferences. Local conditions fluctuate asynchronously so disperse order persist maintain productivity. Habitat are lost sequentially, resulting gradual fragmentation metacommunity. Results: reduces amount conferred structure preventing from environmentally suitable areas. decreases dramatically when with high betweenness centrality lost. Metacommunities generally most robust is random have low centrality.

参考文章(47)
Eva M. Albert, Miguel A. Fortuna, José A. Godoy, Jordi Bascompte, Assessing the robustness of networks of spatial genetic variation. Ecology Letters. ,vol. 16, pp. 86- 93 ,(2013) , 10.1111/ELE.12061
PAP Moran, The statistical analysis of the Canadian Lynx cycle. Australian Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 1, pp. 291- 298 ,(1953) , 10.1071/ZO9530291
David U. Hooper, E. Carol Adair, Bradley J. Cardinale, Jarrett E. K. Byrnes, Bruce A. Hungate, Kristin L. Matulich, Andrew Gonzalez, J. Emmett Duffy, Lars Gamfeldt, Mary I. O’Connor, A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change Nature. ,vol. 486, pp. 105- 108 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NATURE11118
Raphael K. Didham, Valerie Kapos, Robert M. Ewers, Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research Oikos. ,vol. 121, pp. 161- 170 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1600-0706.2011.20273.X
Richard Levins, Coexistence in a Variable Environment The American Naturalist. ,vol. 114, pp. 765- 783 ,(1979) , 10.1086/283527
A.G Bunn, D.L Urban, T.H Keitt, Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 59, pp. 265- 278 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JEMA.2000.0373
Matthew D. Holland, Alan Hastings, Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics Nature. ,vol. 456, pp. 792- 794 ,(2008) , 10.1038/NATURE07395
Ernesto Estrada, Örjan Bodin, Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. Ecological Applications. ,vol. 18, pp. 1810- 1825 ,(2008) , 10.1890/07-1419.1
J. J. Tewksbury, D. J. Levey, N. M. Haddad, S. Sargent, J. L. Orrock, A. Weldon, B. J. Danielson, J. Brinkerhoff, E. I. Damschen, P. Townsend, Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 99, pp. 12923- 12926 ,(2002) , 10.1073/PNAS.202242699
A. Gonzalez, B. Rayfield, Z. Lindo, The disentangled bank: How loss of habitat fragments and disassembles ecological networks American Journal of Botany. ,vol. 98, pp. 503- 516 ,(2011) , 10.3732/AJB.1000424