作者: Vincent P Crawford , Miguel A Costa-Gomes , Nagore Iriberri
DOI: 10.1257/JEL.51.1.5
关键词: Strategic thinking 、 Equilibrium selection 、 Empirical research 、 Game theory 、 Cognitive Hierarchy Theory 、 Non-equilibrium thermodynamics 、 Economics 、 Limiting 、 Mathematical economics
摘要: Most applications of game theory assume equilibrium, justified by presuming either that learning will have converged to one, or equilibrium approximates people’s strategic thinking even when a justification is implausible. Yet several recent experimental and empirical studies suggest initial responses games often deviate systematically from structural nonequilibrium “level-k” “cognitive hierarchy” models out-predict equilibrium. Even possible converges such allow better predictions history-dependent limiting outcomes. This paper surveys evidence on illustrates the level-k in economics. (JEL C70, D03, D82, D83)