Porcine Field Fertility with Two Different Insemination Doses and the Effect of Sperm Morphology

作者: K Alm , OAT Peltoniemi , E Koskinen , M Andersson

DOI: 10.1111/J.1439-0531.2005.00670.X

关键词: Artificial inseminationLitter (animal)AndrologyFertilityPregnancySemenBiologyPregnancy rateInseminationSperm

摘要: In swine artificial insemination, several dose regimens are applied, ranging from 1.5 x 10(9) to 6.0 spermatozoa per intra-cervical insemination dose. A lower sperm is more profitable for centres and offers a effective use of superior boars. To evaluate fertility, 50 boars were used total 10 773 homospermic first inseminations at 2 billion spermatozoa. addition, 96 3 34 789 inseminations. Fertility was determined by 60-day non-return rate (NR%) Litter size registered number piglets born separately in primiparous multiparous farrowings. On average, sow inseminated times. significant decrease observed all three fertility parameters (NR%, litter both farrowings) with compared The NR% 75.8% 84.0% (p < 0.001), the mean farrowings 10.1 10.7 0.001) 11.7 12.1 spermatozoa/dose, respectively. proportion normal morphology analysis correlated significantly regimens: p 0.001, r = 0.604 0.05, 0.223 These results confirm that quantity can least partly compensate poor quality. When <70% evaluation excluded data there no correlation between NR%. However, difference remained statistically favour bigger conclusion, on commercial farms will severely prolificacy under field conditions, where an average times/heat, semen typically within days after collection. We recommend circumstances doses contain <3 spermatozoa/dose.

参考文章(18)
M. K. L. Schmehl, D. S. Nelson, E. F. Graham, Problems with laboratory assays. Proceedings of the eighth technical conference on artificial insemination and reproduction.. pp. 59- 66 ,(1980)
Colenbrander B, Grooten Hj, Feitsma H, Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine. Journal of reproduction and fertility. ,vol. 48, pp. 207- ,(1993)
D. H. Lein, D. J. Jasko, R. H. Foote, Determination of the relationship between sperm morphologic classifications and fertility in stallions: 66 cases (1987-1988). Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 197, pp. 389- 394 ,(1990)
X Xu, S Pommier, T Arbov, B Hutchings, W Sotto, G R Foxcroft, In vitro maturation and fertilization techniques for assessment of semen quality and boar fertility Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 76, pp. 3079- 3089 ,(1998) , 10.2527/1998.76123079X
R. J. Oko, A. D. Barth, Abnormal Morphology of Bovine Spermatozoa ,(1991)
S Martín Rillo, B Pintado, C De Alba, R Sánchez, P García, D Corcuera, C Artiga, A Sagüés, C Díaz, F Sáiz, MC Pérez, None, EFFECT OF COOLED and FROZEN BOAR SEMEN ON EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT Reproduction in Domestic Animals. ,vol. 31, pp. 309- 310 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1439-0531.1996.TB00072.X
D. P. Evenson, Loss of livestock breeding efficiency due to uncompensable sperm nuclear defects. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. ,vol. 11, pp. 1- 16 ,(1999) , 10.1071/RD98023
L. Söderquist, L. Janson, K. Larsson, S. Einarsson, Sperm Morphology and Fertility in A. I. Bulls Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A-physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine. ,vol. 38, pp. 534- 543 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1439-0442.1991.TB01045.X
D. Waberski, S. Meding, G. Dirksen, K.F. Weitze, C. Leiding, R. Hahn, Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen Animal Reproduction Science. ,vol. 36, pp. 145- 151 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0378-4320(94)90061-2