Size Matters: How Big Should a Military Design Team be?

作者: Michael L Hammerstrom

DOI:

关键词: Organizational theoryKnowledge managementManagement scienceTeam effectivenessMilitary doctrineMultidisciplinary approachContext (language use)DesigntheoryLeverage (negotiation)Team compositionPsychology

摘要: Abstract : While the literature on size of small groups and teams is extensive, there little research design team sizes no formal or analysis a military team. This monograph investigates optimal composition for The multidisciplinary survey that draws from theory, organization leadership social psychology, anthropology. results indicate ideal 5 to 6 people; however, can be effective up 9. findings also demonstrate 20 members create an inefficient use cross-functional X-team structures provides basis team's structure composition. will most likely in some manner due diverse educational background its joint combined nature operations organizations. However, holds potential external focus. enables leverage resources develop concept best fit their unique operational context.

参考文章(63)
Mitchell D. McCorcle, Critical Issues in the Functioning of Interdisciplinary Groups. Small Group Behavior. ,vol. 13, pp. 291- 310 ,(1982) , 10.1177/104649648201300302
Clare Cooper Marcus, Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research Journal of Architectural Education. ,vol. 35, pp. 57- 57 ,(1981) , 10.1080/10464883.1981.10758280
Allen C. Amason, Harry J. Sapienza, The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict Journal of Management. ,vol. 23, pp. 495- 516 ,(1997) , 10.1177/014920639702300401
Jerayr Haleblian, Sydney Finkelstein, Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Discretion Academy of Management Journal. ,vol. 36, pp. 844- 863 ,(1993) , 10.5465/256761
Julie T. Klein, Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 35, ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2008.05.010
Stephen Jay Kline, Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking Stanford University Press. ,(2020) , 10.1515/9780804763936
Patrick R. Laughlin, Bryan L. Bonner, Andrew G. Miner, Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 88, pp. 605- 620 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00003-1
Donald W. Taylor, William L. Faust, Twenty questions: efficiency in problem solving as a function of size of group. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 44, pp. 360- 368 ,(1952) , 10.1037/H0054376