Author’s Response: The Epistemological Argument
作者： Krzysztof C. Matuszek
DOI:
关键词: Philosophy 、 Neurophenomenology 、 Enactivism 、 Autopoiesis 、 Epistemological pluralism 、 Epistemology 、 Constructivism (philosophy of education)
摘要: Upshot: The commentaries concentrate mostly on ontological issues but overlook the main epistemological argument in my target article. This refers to conditions that make cognition …
constructivist.info参考文章(49)
Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity ,(1985)
Armin Scholl, Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint Constructivist Foundations. ,vol. 8, pp. 5- 12 ,(2012)
Niklas Luhmann, "Was ist der Fall?" und "Was steckt dahinter?" - Die zwei Soziologien und die Gesellschaftstheorie Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie. ,vol. 22, pp. 245- 260 ,(1993) , 10.1515/ZFSOZ-1993-0401
Kirsten von Elverfeldt, Philipp Aufenvenne, Heike Egner, On Climate Change Research, the Crisis of Science and Second-order Science Constructivist Foundations. ,vol. 10, pp. 120- 129 ,(2014)
Armin Scholl, Julia Völker, Do the Media Fail to Represent Reality? A Constructivist and Second-order Critique of the Research on Environmental Media Coverage and Its Normative Implications Constructivist Foundations. ,vol. 10, pp. 140- 149 ,(2014)
Lucy A. Suchman, Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. ,(2007)
Hans-Georg Moeller, Luhmann Explained: From Souls to Systems ,(2006)
Hans-Georg Moeller, The Radical Luhmann ,(2011)
William W. Rasch, Niklas Luhmann's Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation ,(2000)
Heinz von Foerster, Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition ,(2002)