Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship.

作者: STANLEY T. ASAH , DALE J. BLAHNA

DOI: 10.1111/COBI.12058

关键词: StewardshipConservation biologyId, ego and super-egoFace (sociological concept)Public relationsConservation psychologyCommunity buildingPsychologyOrganizational commitmentTurnover

摘要: Although the word commitment is prevalent in conservation biology literature and despite importance of people's to success initiatives, as a psychological phenomenon its operation specific behaviors remains unexplored. Despite increasing calls for psychology play greater role meeting goals, applications sciences behaviors, illustrating their utility practice, are rare. We examined volunteers' motivations urban volunteering. interviewed key informant volunteers used interview findings develop psychometric scales that we assess volunteer. surveyed 322 factor analysis reveal how structure volunteer activities. Six categories 2 emerged from analysis. Volunteers were motivated by desires help environment, defend enhance ego, career learning opportunities, escape exercise, social interactions, community building. Two forms commitment, affective normative psychologically bind people volunteerism. linear-regression models examine these influence Volunteers' tendency continue conservation, even face fluctuating counter urges, was personal, social, functions more than environmental motivations. The otherwise marginally important, significant motivator only when volunteering met community-building goals. Attention may stewardship address pressing challenge retaining volunteers.

参考文章(49)
Irene Miles, William C Sullivan, Frances E Kuo, None, Ecological restoration volunteers: the benefits of participation Urban Ecosystems. ,vol. 2, pp. 27- 41 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1009501515335
P. R. Ehrlich, Millennium Assessment of Human Behavior Science. ,vol. 309, pp. 562- 563 ,(2005) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1113028
P. WESLEY SCHULTZ, Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1080- 1083 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01766.X
Rachel Kaplan, Stephen Kaplan, Bringing Out the Best in People: a Psychological Perspective Conservation Biology. ,vol. 22, pp. 826- 829 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2008.01010.X
MARK ELBROCH, TUYENI H. MWAMPAMBA, MARIA J. SANTOS, MAXINE ZYLBERBERG, LOUIS LIEBENBERG, JAMES MINYE, CHRISTOPHER MOSSER, ERIN REDDY, The value, limitations, and challenges of employing local experts in conservation research. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 25, pp. 1195- 1202 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2011.01740.X
David W. Orr, The psychology of survival. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 22, pp. 819- 822 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2008.01008.X
Mark Snyder, Basic Research and Practical Problems: The Promise of a "Functional" Personality and Social Psychology Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. ,vol. 19, pp. 251- 264 ,(1993) , 10.1177/0146167293193001
Arnon E. Reichers, A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment Academy of Management Review. ,vol. 10, pp. 465- 476 ,(1985) , 10.5465/AMR.1985.4278960
Elizabeth Gosling, Kathryn J.H. Williams, Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers Journal of Environmental Psychology. ,vol. 30, pp. 298- 304 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JENVP.2010.01.005