The “New Drug Reimbursement” Game

作者: Brita A. K. Pekarsky

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08903-4_8

关键词: Marginal costMarket powerDrug reimbursementBusinessActuarial scienceAsk priceInstitutionShadow pricePopulationEconomic rent

摘要: If a new drug’s incremental price-effectiveness ratio (IPER) is above the health shadow price, β c , best alternative strategy to drug reimbursement will result in more benefits population, for same financial cost. The historic decision threshold (k) most countries likely be significantly higher that price. regulator chooses reject as consequence of adopting lower threshold, firms might make following threat: At IPERs below k, it not financially viable supply drugs this country. weight threat could significant, particularly when have substantial clinical benefit some patient groups. How should rational institution respond? In chapter, question first analysed conventional theoretic (non-strategic) model optimal response by regulators evidence price drugs. Then within analysis (PEA) framework. PEA uses an applied game assumes act strategically and target patients, maximand. I conclude reimburse with multiple players who where objective Institution maximise population’s health. second conclusion population health-maximising maintain \( \beta \) c.

参考文章(20)
Alex Berenson, A cancer drug shows promise, at a price that many can't pay. The New York times on the Web. ,(2006)
Andrew R. Willan, Andrew H. Briggs, Statistical Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Data ,(2006)
Steven E. Landsburg, Price Theory and Applications ,(1989)
M. Boggild, J. Palace, P. Barton, Y. Ben-Shlomo, T. Bregenzer, C. Dobson, R. Gray, Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: two year results of clinical cohort study with historical comparator BMJ. ,vol. 339, pp. 1- 9 ,(2009) , 10.1136/BMJ.B4677
Anthony Culyer, Christopher McCabe, Andrew Briggs, Karl Claxton, Martin Buxton, Ron Akehurst, Mark Sculpher, John Brazier, Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. ,vol. 12, pp. 56- 58 ,(2007) , 10.1258/135581907779497567
Milton C. Weinstein, How Much Are Americans Willing to Pay for a Quality-Adjusted Life Year? Medical Care. ,vol. 46, pp. 343- 345 ,(2008) , 10.1097/MLR.0B013E31816A7144
Pedram Sendi, Maiwenn J Al, Amiram Gafni, Stephen Birch, Portfolio theory and the alternative decision rule of cost-effectiveness analysis: theoretical and practical considerations. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 58, pp. 1853- 1855 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2004.01.001