Assessing health risk behaviors among adolescents: The effect of question wording and appeals for honesty

作者: Nancy D. Brener , Jo Anne Grunbaum , Tim McManus , Laura Kann , Jim Ross

DOI: 10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2003.08.013

关键词: HonestySubstance abuseSocial psychologyYouth Risk Behavior SurveyAppealPopulationMental healthPsychologyContext (language use)Monitoring the Future

摘要: Abstract Purpose To understand how methodological factors influence prevalence estimates of health-risk behaviors obtained from surveys, we examined the effect varying question wording and honesty appeals while holding other aspects surveys constant. Methods A convenience sample students (n = 4140) in grades 9 through 12 was randomly assigned to complete one six versions a paper-and-pencil questionnaire classrooms. Each version represented different combination appeal (standard vs. strong) type. The types varied number questions assessing particular behaviors. questionnaires were based on those used three national surveys—the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Monitoring Future, National Household Survey Drug Abuse. Logistic regression analyses responses each survey behavior associated with type, appeal, interaction two variables. Results Among 32 across types, showed significant 45 identical five main all 77 behaviors, for between Conclusions When population, setting, context, mode administration, data-editing protocols are held constant, differences can create statistically some estimates. Varying does not have an

参考文章(14)
Wilfred Ruprecht Bion, Learning from Experience ,(1962)
Joseph Gfroerer, Doug Wright, Andrea Kopstein, Prevalence of youth substance use: the impact of methodological differences between two national surveys Drug and Alcohol Dependence. ,vol. 47, pp. 19- 30 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0376-8716(97)00063-X
U. E. Bauer, T. M. Johnson, Editing Data: What Difference Do Consistency Checks Make? American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 151, pp. 921- 925 ,(2000) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A010296
Patrick M. O'Malley, Jerald G. Bachman, Lloyd D. Johnston, Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2001. For full text: http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/overview2001.. ,(2002)
Lloyd D. Johnston, Patrick M. O’Malley, Jerald G. Bachman, Monitoring the Future: National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings FOCUS. ,vol. 1, pp. 213- 234 ,(2003) , 10.1176/FOC.1.2.213
Mark B. Coggeshall, Paul M. Kingery, Cross-Survey Analysis of School Violence and Disorder. Psychology in the Schools. ,vol. 38, pp. 107- 116 ,(2001) , 10.1002/PITS.1003
Laura Kann, Janet L. Collins, Lloyd J. Kolbe, Overview of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System Public Health Reports. ,vol. 108, pp. 2- 10 ,(1993)
Michael Fendrich, Timothy P Johnson, None, Examining Prevalence Differences in Three National Surveys of Youth: Impact of Consent Procedures, Mode, and Editing Rules: Journal of Drug Issues. ,vol. 31, pp. 615- 642 ,(2001) , 10.1177/002204260103100303
Floyd Jackson Fowler, Vickie L. Stringfellow, Learning from Experience: Estimating Teen Use of Alcohol, Cigarettes, and Marijuana from Three Survey Protocols: Journal of Drug Issues. ,vol. 31, pp. 643- 664 ,(2001) , 10.1177/002204260103100304