The Effect of Scale Tailoring for Cross-Cultural Application on Scale Reliability and Construct Validity:
作者： Alvara J. Arce-Ferrer , John J. Ketterer
DOI: 10.1177/0013164403063003009
关键词: Construct validity 、 Validity 、 Self-efficacy 、 Test validity 、 Applied psychology 、 Scale (ratio) 、 Cross-cultural 、 Social psychology 、 Emic and etic 、 Psychology 、 Psychometrics
摘要: This article summarizes main findings from a two-step investigation about the effects of tailoring scale with etic and emic items extreme-response styles on validity reliability scores. The Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy was chosen, its Spanish version tailored translated items, adapted newly developed items. administered to two independent samples high school students Mexico. Reliability estimates for scales were marginally different between them respect those English language. Tailoring best neither improved recovery five-dimension structure nor reduced extreme response style variable.
sagepub.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(26)
Darrell Anthony Luzzo, Reliability and Validity Testing of the Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. ,vol. 26, ,(1993)
Ronald K. Hambleton, Russell W. Jones, Comparison of Empirical and Judgmental Procedures for Detecting Differential Item Functioning. Educational research quarterly. ,vol. 18, pp. 21- 36 ,(1992)
Nadya A. Fouad, Philip L. Smith, Larry Enochs, Reliability and Validity Evidence for the Middle School Self-Efficacy Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. ,vol. 30, pp. 17- 31 ,(1997) , 10.1080/07481756.1997.12068914
Wai Chan, Ringo M Ho, Kwok Leung, Darius K-S Chan, Yiu-Fai Yung, None, An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods. ,vol. 4, pp. 378- 402 ,(1999) , 10.1037/1082-989X.4.4.378
Robert R. McCrae, Alan B. Zonderman, Paul T. Costa, Michael H. Bond, Sampo V. Paunonen, Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 70, pp. 552- 566 ,(1996) , 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
Jagdish N. Sheth, Stanley A. Mulaik, The foundations of factor analysis Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 70, pp. 250- ,(1975) , 10.2307/2285414
Judith L. Gibbons, Jennifer A. Zellner, David J. Rudek, Effects of Language and Meaningfulness on the Use of Extreme Response Style by Spanish-English Bilinguals Cross-Cultural Research. ,vol. 33, pp. 369- 381 ,(1999) , 10.1177/106939719903300404
Paul Barrett, FACTOR COMPARISON: AN EXAMINATION OF THREE METHODS Personality and Individual Differences. ,vol. 7, pp. 327- 340 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90008-5
Avi Allalouf, Ronald K. Hambleton, Stephen G. Sireci, Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items Journal of Educational Measurement. ,vol. 36, pp. 185- 198 ,(1999) , 10.1111/J.1745-3984.1999.TB00553.X
Bruce Korth, L.R Tucker, Procrustes matching by congruence coefficients Psychometrika. ,vol. 41, pp. 531- 535 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF02296973