The capability approach: A promising foundation for sustainable development?
作者： Jürgen Volkert , Matthias Seckler
DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2021.106951
关键词: Political science 、 Democracy 、 Sustainable development 、 Deliberative democracy 、 Capability approach 、 Foundation (evidence) 、 Engineering ethics
摘要: Abstract Over the past few years, capability approach (CA) has been increasingly recognized as a promising foundation of sustainable development despite persistent critiques its deliberative democracy concept. This paper theoretically and empirically analyzes CA's potential challenges for development. We find that CA is more suitable than standard economic theory theoretical framework Some, although not all implicit motivational assumptions, are confirmed by our empirical findings. also that, to overcome idealized concept deliberate democracy, will have be strengthened. finally discuss need future research ways further develop
sci-hub.st 参考文章(51)
Trevor Tchir, Aristotelian Practical Reason in Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice Social Science Research Network. ,(2011)
Christian Könnecke, Martin Kroh, Arm, arbeitslos und politisch inaktiv? DIW Wochenbericht. ,vol. 80, pp. 3- 15 ,(2013)
David Schlosberg, Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature Oxford University Press. ,(2007)
Des Gasper, What is the capability approach? The Journal of Socio-Economics. ,vol. 36, pp. 335- 359 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2006.12.001
Martha Craven Nussbaum, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership ,(2006)
Amartya Kumar Sen, Development as Freedom ,(1999)
A. Colin Cameron, Pravin K. Trivedi, Microeconometrics : methods and applications Cambridge University Press. ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511811241
Elisabeth Gsottbauer, Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh, Bounded rationality and social interaction in negotiating a climate agreement International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. ,vol. 13, pp. 225- 249 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S10784-012-9182-1
Manjusha Gupte, Robert V. Bartlett, Necessary Preconditions for Deliberative Environmental Democracy? Challenging the Modernity Bias of Current Theory Global Environmental Politics. ,vol. 7, pp. 94- 106 ,(2007) , 10.1162/GLEP.2007.7.3.94
Elizabeth Anderson, SEN, ETHICS, AND DEMOCRACY Feminist Economics. ,vol. 9, pp. 239- 261 ,(2003) , 10.1080/1354570022000077953