Limits of detection of nuclear DNA abnormalities by flow cytometric DNA analysis. Results obtained by a set of methods for sample‐storage, staining and internal standardization

作者: Lars L. Vindeløv , Ib J. Christensen , Grethe Jensen , Nis I. Nissen

DOI: 10.1002/CYTO.990030505

关键词: KaryotypeConfidence intervalNuclear DNAFlow cytometryDNACoefficient of variationStainingBiologyA-DNAMolecular biology

摘要: Flow cytometric DNA analysis is an attractive alternative to conventional cytogenetics for diagnosing karyotype changes resulting in abnormal content. We have developed methods long-term storage of samples and standards, staining the cells standardization measurements by two internal standards. In this paper currently attainable resolution was determined limiting factors were identified. Normal reference values male female leucocytes analyzing 240 from six men women, all cytogenetically normal. The content 1.5% higher than that cells. This finding used correct results sex related differences. 95% confidence limits mononuclear blood ±0.79%. on granulocytes exceptionally variable, with ±1.79%. Reexamination normal after 1 year showed a drift up 2% results, indicating need regular checks values. addition differences content, individual 1% demonstrated. creates problems as which value use particular sample. Furthermore, tissue fluorescence found when different tissues one mouse examined. means had range 0.7%. add uncertainty interpretation results. heterogeneous populations slightly examined mixtures known ranging 1.50% 5.83%. With coefficient variation peaks about difference approximately 4% required accurate determination populations. A lower would increase resolution, but could then become factor.

参考文章(20)
F B Moore, M W Shaw, A P Craig-Holmes, Polymorphism of human C-band heterochromatin. I. Frequency of variants. American Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 25, pp. 181- 192 ,(1973)
H Hoehn, J Callis, Flow-fluorometric diagnosis of euploid and aneuploid human lymphocytes. American Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 28, pp. 577- 584 ,(1976)
Lars L. Vindeløv, Ib J. Christensen, Niels Keiding, Mogens Spang-Thomsen, Nis I. Nissen, Long-term storage of samples for flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry. ,vol. 3, pp. 317- 322 ,(1983) , 10.1002/CYTO.990030502
Lars L. Vindeløv, Ib J. Christensen, Nis I. Nissen, A Detergent-trypsin method for the preparation of nuclei for flow cytometric DNA analysis† Cytometry. ,vol. 3, pp. 323- 327 ,(1983) , 10.1002/CYTO.990030503
F. J. Otto, H. Oldiges, W. Göhde, V. K. Jain, Flow cytometric measurement of nuclear DNA content variations as a potential in vivo mutagenicity test Cytometry. ,vol. 2, pp. 189- 191 ,(1981) , 10.1002/CYTO.990020311
Jerry T. Thornthwaite, Everett V. Sugarbaker, Wally J. Temple, Preparation of tissues for DNA flow cytometric analysis Cytometry. ,vol. 1, pp. 229- 237 ,(1980) , 10.1002/CYTO.990010309
MARVIN L. MEISTRICH, WOLFGANG GÖHDE, R. ALLEN WHITE, JOHANNES SCHUMANN, Resolution of X and Y spermatids by pulse cytophotometry. Nature. ,vol. 274, pp. 821- 823 ,(1978) , 10.1038/274821A0
Edward B. Fowlkes, Some Methods for Studying the Mixture of Two Normal (Lognormal) Distributions Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 74, pp. 561- 575 ,(1979) , 10.1080/01621459.1979.10481652
Isidore Eisenberger, Genesis of Bimodal Distributions Technometrics. ,vol. 6, pp. 357- 363 ,(1964) , 10.1080/00401706.1964.10490199