Semantic Change and Extension Enforcement in Abstract Argumentation
作者： Sylvie Doutre , Jean-Guy Mailly
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_14
关键词: Knowledge management 、 Semantics 、 Extension (predicate logic) 、 Enforcement 、 Structure (mathematical logic) 、 Graph (abstract data type) 、 Computer science 、 Semantic change 、 Epistemology 、 Outcome (game theory) 、 Argumentation theory
摘要: Change in argumentation frameworks has been widely studied the recent years. Most of existing works on this topic are concerned with change structure graph (addition or removal arguments and attacks), outcome framework (acceptance statuses arguments). acceptability semantics that is used not received much attention so far. Such a can be motivated by different reasons, especially it way to framework. In paper, shown how semantic as reach goal about acceptance situation extension enforcement.
springer.com
archives-ouvertes.fr
sci-hub.st 参考文章(27)
Gerhard Brewka, Ringo Baumann, Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results computational models of argument. pp. 75- 86 ,(2010)
Sylvie Coste-Marquis, Sébastien Konieczny, Jean-Guy Mailly, Pierre Marquis, A Translation-Based Approach for Revision of Argumentation Frameworks european conference on logics in artificial intelligence. pp. 397- 411 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_28
Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim, Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks scalable uncertainty management. pp. 134- 147 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_11
Laurent Perrussel, Andreas Herzig, Sylvie Doutre, A dynamic logic framework for abstract argumentation principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 62- 71 ,(2014)
Souhila Kaci, Guido Boella, Leendert van der Torre, Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension adaptive agents and multi agents systems. pp. 1213- 1214 ,(2009)
Guido Boella, Souhila Kaci, Leendert van der Torre, Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: attack refinement and the grounded extension (extended version) ArgMAS'09 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ,vol. 6057, pp. 150- 159 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_9
P.M. Dung, P. Mancarella, F. Toni, Computing ideal sceptical argumentation Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 171, pp. 642- 674 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2007.05.003
Pietro Baroni, Martin Caminada, Massimiliano Giacomin, Review: an introduction to argumentation semantics Knowledge Engineering Review. ,vol. 26, pp. 365- 410 ,(2011) , 10.1017/S0269888911000166
Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. ,vol. 50, pp. 854- 866 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.IJAR.2009.02.006
Pierre Bisquert, Claudette Cayrol, Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Change in argumentation systems: exploring the interest of removing an argument scalable uncertainty management. pp. 275- 288 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_22