Industrial ecosystem indicators—direct and indirect effects of integrated waste- and by-product management and energy production

作者: Jouni Korhonen , Lasse Okkonen , Ville Niutanen

DOI: 10.1007/S10098-003-0234-7

关键词: Production (economics)Economic indicatorEngineeringResource (project management)Process (engineering)Cleaner productionSustainable developmentProduct (category theory)Environmental resource managementRevenueEnvironmental economics

摘要: In an idealised industrial ecosystem (IE), firms and organisations utilise each other's material energy flows including wastes by-products to reduce the system's virgin input as well waste emission output from system a whole, contribute sustainable development (SD). IE complements more conventional individual flow, product, process, organisation, actor or sector-focused environmental management approaches tools with network systems level approaches. The first research objective of this paper is construct indicators for IE. second task test use these "what if?" flow scenarios Satakunta region in Finland 28 municipalities. Using literature analysis source, we arrive at carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents, economic fuel, costs revenues. social show employment effects system. analyse current situation (0-scenario) against alternative situations future. future are developed according known anticipated trends international national policy legislation. indicator application produces social, four categories: direct negative, positive, indirect negative positive. Industrial theory emphasises utilisation resource value alongside reducing waste. Therefore, positive important, focus management, which has usually been on effects. main difficulties our argument boundary definition, qualitatively different nature environmental, lack qualitative interview data preferences interests actors involved.

参考文章(50)
Gro Harlem Brundtland, Our common future Earth and Us#R##N#Population–Resources–Environment–Development. pp. 29- 31 ,(1987) , 10.1016/B978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5
Robert U. Ayres, Udo Ernst Simonis, Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development ,(1994)
Miika Kajanus, Mikko Kurttila, Jyrki Kangas, Mauno Pesonen, Petri Heinonen, Assessing the priorities using A'WOT among resource management strategies at the Finnish Forest and Park Service. Forest Science. ,vol. 47, pp. 534- 541 ,(2001) , 10.1093/FORESTSCIENCE/47.4.534
Richard J. Chorley, Robert John Bennett, Environmental systems: Philosophy, analysis, and control ,(1978)
Mikko Kurttila, Mauno Pesonen, Jyrki Kangas, Miika Kajanus, Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis — a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 1, pp. 41- 52 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00004-0
Jouni Korhonen, Margareta Wihersaari, Ilkka Savolainen, None, Industrial ecosystem in the Finnish forest industry: using the material and energy flow model of a forest ecosystem in a forest industry system Ecological Economics. ,vol. 39, pp. 145- 161 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00204-X
F.A.A. Boons, L.W. Baas, Types of industrial ecology: The problem of coordination Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 5, pp. 79- 86 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00007-3
J Hokkanen, R Lahdelma, P Salminen, Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 60, pp. 339- 348 ,(2000) , 10.1006/JEMA.2000.0389
Catherine Hardy, Thomas E. Graedel, Industrial Ecosystems as Food Webs Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 29- 38 ,(2002) , 10.1162/108819802320971623
Braden R. Allenby, William E. Cooper, Understanding industrial ecology from a biological systems perspective Environmental Quality Management. ,vol. 3, pp. 343- 354 ,(1994) , 10.1002/TQEM.3310030310