The Spatiality of Standard Evolution â?? Standardization in the Wind Industry from a Spatial View

作者: Markus Adrian

DOI:

关键词: Industry evolutionEconomyRegional scienceQualitative interviewsStandardizationInterdependenceValue (ethics)CertificationGeographyCommissionBusiness cluster

摘要: Abstract for the DRUID Academy Conference 2015 21.-13.01.2015, Aalborg on The Spatiality of Standard Evolution â?? Standardization in Wind Industry from a Spatial View October 2014 Jan Markus Adrian* * markus-adrian@geowiss.uni-hamburg.de, University Hamburg, Institute Geography, BundesstraA?e 55, D-20146 enrolment: 2012, expected final date: Summer Standards play an important role industry evolution. co-evolution standards and clusters, however, is less scrutinized. paper shows how different clusters participate standardization, while again affect clusters. relatively young dynamically globalizing wind will be used. A framework by Menzel Grillitsch (2014) applied to show differing interrelations between cluster standard evolution during formation, diffusion impact. Data collected via documentary research documents guidelines as well academic literature. Supplemental qualitative interviews with setting institutions certification companies are conducted. Results show, that development started countries strong industry, especially Denmark, whose manufacturers dominated early market. Due joint efforts public industrial actors, standardization often was spatially connected further European markets resulted coexistence various national standards, which later were re-combined create international ones. These today developed International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), located Switzerland. Thus, their definition no longer influence whole as, examples, Global Value Chains being modularized relations change accordingly. impacts regions. thus distinct spatiality interrelation Literature /Grillitsch Divergent Spatialities Interdependencies Clusters. Paper presented at Workshop Cluster Life Cycles Kiel, September 15-16. 18 pages

参考文章(25)
Peter Karnøe, Peer Hull Kristensen, Poul Houman Andersen, Mobilizing Resources and Generating Competencies Handelshøjskolens Forlag. ,(1999)
Garth Saloner, Joseph Farrell, Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces ,(2011)
Ash Amin, Patrick Cohendet, Learning and Adaptation in Decentralised Business Networks Environment and Planning D-society & Space. ,vol. 17, pp. 87- 104 ,(1999) , 10.1068/D170087
Paul A. David, Shane Greenstein, The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 Economics of Innovation and New Technology. ,vol. 1, pp. 3- 41 ,(1990) , 10.1080/10438599000000002
Sebastian Botzem, Leonhard Dobusch, Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards: Organization Studies. ,vol. 33, pp. 737- 762 ,(2012) , 10.1177/0170840612443626
Nils Brunsson, Andreas Rasche, David Seidl, The Dynamics of Standardization Organization Studies. ,vol. 30, pp. 453- 454 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0170840609104565
James Simmie, Simone Strambach, The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: an evolutionary and institutional perspective Journal of Knowledge Management. ,vol. 10, pp. 26- 40 ,(2006) , 10.1108/13673270610691152
Stefano Ponte, Peter Gibbon, Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains Economy and Society. ,vol. 34, pp. 1- 31 ,(2005) , 10.1080/0308514042000329315