Planning, economic development and the spatial outcomes of market liberalisation
作者： Glen Searle , Richard Cardew
DOI: 10.1080/08111140008727843
关键词: Process (engineering) 、 Context (language use) 、 Economic growth 、 Neoliberalism 、 Market economy 、 Urban governance 、 Market liberalisation 、 Economics
摘要: Abstract The shift of urban governance to neoliberalism raises questions for the role planning in economic development. Local plans may need be overruled, but this creates potential contradictions. context is critical process. In Sydney, has been subordinate development under market liberalisation since late 1970s.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(29)
Donald R. Denman, Land in a free society ,(1980)
Philip Allmendinger, Huw Thomas, Urban Planning and the British New Right ,(1998)
Ann Capling, Michael Crozier, Mark Considine, Australian politics in the global era ,(1998)
A. Melamed, The Death and Life of Great American Cities ,(1961)
Brendan Gleeson, Nicholas Low, Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas ,(2000)
Nigel Taylor, Urban planning theory since 1945 ,(1998)
Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom ,(1962)
James O'Connor, The fiscal crisis of the state ,(1973)
W Dennis Keating, Cleveland the Comeback City: The Politics of Redevelopment and Sports Stadiums Amidst Urban Decline Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory, Regulating Urban Politics in a Global Economy. ,(1996)
JEREMY DAWKINS, IN PRAISE OF REGULATION Australian Planner. ,vol. 33, pp. 10- 15 ,(1996) , 10.1080/07293682.1996.9657703