A study of the mechanism of resistance to Adriamycin® in vivo: Glutathione metabolism, P-glycoprotein expression, and drug transport

作者: Francis Y.F. Lee , James Sciandra , Dietmar W. Siemann

DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(89)90575-3

关键词: Multiple drug resistanceP-glycoproteinIn vivoGlutathioneBiochemistryGlutathione peroxidasePharmacologyButhionine sulfoximineBiologyMechanism of actionDrug resistance

摘要: Abstract A spontaneously originated murine mammary adenocarcinoma (16C), selected for its sensitivity to agents active against breast cancer in women, and one of the very few experimental solid tumor models responsive Adriamycin® (ADR) was used study mechanism induced ADR resistance vivo . resistant variant obtained from explant a regrown following dose (12 mg/kg) that caused complete repression but not cure. Progressive refractoriness observed up six repeated cycles treatment, regression regrowth. However, beyond sixth no further degree could be obtained. The cell line so established, designated 16C/ADR R , has glutathione (GSH) content 1.67 times greater than parent 16C line. Depletion GSH by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) enhanced cytoxicity both lines. sensitization effect appeared dependent on depletion, requiring threshold level depletion approximately 30% control. however, directly related increased absolute per se since reduction levels similar did restore original ADR. activities two important elements detoxification system, peroxidase S -transferase, were found elevated cells factors 2.4 4.7–5.6 respectively. In studies with diverse spectrum antineoplastic drugs revealed pattern cross-resistance consistent idea -transferase may responsible decreased (2.8- 5.3-fold) exhibited melphalan (MEL), none vincristine (VCR), vinblastine (VBL) or etoposide (VP-16). These results clearly demonstrate non-adherence tumors well characterized multidrug ( mdr ) phenotype. Further affirmation this conclusion immunochemical pharmacological studies. When monoclonal antibody prepared associated, 170 kD P-glycoprotein (170 P-gp), used, presence P-gp sensitive lines detected, although lower molecular weight form ruled out entirely. High performance liquid chromatographic measurement accumulation elimination also failed reveal any significant differences between variants. results, therefore, argue possibility drug transport membrane changes as resistance, strongly implicate increases basis situ tumor.

参考文章(31)
Bengt Mannervik, The Isoenzymes of Glutathione Transferase Advances in Enzymology - and Related Areas of Molecular Biology. ,vol. 57, pp. 357- 417 ,(2006) , 10.1002/9780470123034.CH5
William H. Habig, William B. Jakoby, Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-transferases. Methods in Enzymology. ,vol. 77, pp. 398- 405 ,(1981) , 10.1016/S0076-6879(81)77053-8
D. W. Siemann, P. C. Keng, M. J. Allalunis-Turner, F. Y. F. Lee, Glutathione Contents in Human and Rodent Tumor Cells in Various Phases of the Cell Cycle Cancer Research. ,vol. 48, pp. 3661- 3665 ,(1988)
G Batist, A Tulpule, B K Sinha, A G Katki, C E Myers, K H Cowan, Overexpression of a novel anionic glutathione transferase in multidrug-resistant human breast cancer cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. ,vol. 261, pp. 15544- 15549 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)66748-1
B B Etiz, B I Sikic, W G Harker, D Bauer, R A Newman, Verapamil-mediated sensitization of doxorubicin-selected pleiotropic resistance in human sarcoma cells: selectivity for drugs which produce DNA scission. Cancer Research. ,vol. 46, pp. 2369- 2373 ,(1986)
FYF Lee, MJ Allalunis-Turner, DW Siemann, Depletion of tumour versus normal tissue glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 56, pp. 33- 38 ,(1987) , 10.1038/BJC.1987.148