Allometry and partitioning of above- and below-ground biomass in farmed eucalyptus species dominant in Western Kenyan agricultural landscapes

作者: Shem Kuyah , Johannes Dietz , Catherine Muthuri , Meine van Noordwijk , Henry Neufeldt

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2013.02.011

关键词: BiomassPopulationCarbon accountingForestryEnvironmental scienceAgroforestryDiameter at breast heightAllometryCarbon sequestrationEucalyptusCrown (botany)

摘要: Abstract Farmers in developing countries are one of the world's largest and most efficient producers sequestered carbon. However, measuring, monitoring verifying how much carbon trees smallholder farms removing from atmosphere has remained a great challenge nations. Devising reliable way for measuring associated with agricultural landscapes is essential helping farmers benefit emerging markets. This study aimed to develop biomass equations specific dominant eucalyptus species found Western Kenya. Allometric relationships were developed by regressing diameter at breast height (DBH) alone or DBH combination height, wood density crown area against 48 destructively sampled 100 km2 site. was significant predictor variable estimated aboveground (AGB) over 95% accuracy. The stems, branches leaves formed up 74, 22 4% AGB, respectively, while belowground (BGB) harvested accounted 21% total tree biomass, yielding an overall root-to-shoot ratio (RS) 0.27, which varied across size. Total held live Eucalyptus be 24.4 ± 0.01 Mg ha−1, equivalent 11.7 ± 0.01 Mg per hectare. presented provide useful tools estimating stocks bio-energy accounting. These can applied systems similar agro-ecological settings where growth parameters would fall within ranges comparable population.

参考文章(27)
Jim Penman, Michael Gytarsky, Taka Hiraishi, Thelma Krug, Dina Kruger, Riitta Pipatti, Leandro Buendia, Kyoko Miwa, Todd Ngara, Kiyoto Tanabe, F. Wagner, None, Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Institute of Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), on behalf of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Hayama, Japan.. ,(2003)
J.K. Kiplagat, R.Z. Wang, T.X. Li, Renewable energy in Kenya: Resource potential and status of exploitation Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 15, pp. 2960- 2973 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2011.03.023
F. Muñoz, R. Rubilar, M. Espinosa, J. Cancino, J. Toro, M. Herrera, The effect of pruning and thinning on above ground aerial biomass of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane & Maiden) Maiden Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 255, pp. 365- 373 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2007.09.063
Bruce W Nelson, Rita Mesquita, Jorge LG Pereira, Silas Garcia Aquino De Souza, Getulio Teixeira Batista, Luciana Bovino Couto, None, Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 117, pp. 149- 167 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00475-7
M. Henry, P. Tittonell, R.J. Manlay, M. Bernoux, A. Albrecht, B. Vanlauwe, Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 129, pp. 238- 252 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2008.09.006
Ramarson H. Razakamanarivo, Ando Razakavololona, Marie-Antoinette Razafindrakoto, Ghislain Vieilledent, Alain Albrecht, Below-ground biomass production and allometric relationships of eucalyptus coppice plantation in the central highlands of Madagascar Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 45, pp. 1- 10 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2011.01.020
Shem Kuyah, Johannes Dietz, Catherine Muthuri, Ramni Jamnadass, Peter Mwangi, Richard Coe, Henry Neufeldt, Allometric equations for estimating biomass in agricultural landscapes: I. Aboveground biomass Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 158, pp. 216- 224 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2012.05.010
Farrah R. Fatemi, Ruth D. Yanai, Steven P. Hamburg, Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur, Mary A. Arthur, Russell D. Briggs, Carrie R. Levine, Allometric equations for young northern hardwoods: the importance of age-specific equations for estimating aboveground biomass Canadian Journal of Forest Research. ,vol. 41, pp. 881- 891 ,(2011) , 10.1139/X10-248