Comparative analysis of legislative requirements about patients' access to biotechnological drugs for rare diseases in central and Eastern European countries

作者: Maria Kamusheva , Manoela Manova , Alexandra T. Savova , Guenka I. Petrova , Konstantin Mitov

DOI: 10.3389/FPHAR.2018.00795

关键词: ReimbursementOrphan drugEastern europeanEconomic policyEuropean unionLegislatureBusiness

摘要: The aim of the study was to compare access patients with rare diseases (RDs) biotechnological drugs in several Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs). We focused on legislative pricing reimbursement requirements, availability orphan medicinal products (BOMPs) for RDs, expenditures. A questionnaire-based survey conducted among experts from 10 CEECs: Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Serbia Macedonia. legal requirements BOMPs were collected. All medicines without prior designations extracted list products, 2017. status these 2017 public coverage included CEECs, as well share their costs relation total pharmaceutical spending period 2014 2016, defined. Our revealed that some differences amongst study. Union have developed implemented pharmacoeconomic guidelines or specific products. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility Markov models, meta-analysis discount levels results required only Poland Hungary. number reimbursed RDs a designation highest Hungary (17 40, respectively). Patient-based schemes available 11 out 17 BOMPs. Greece expenditure are approximately 214 million 180 EUR, respectively observed period. High proportion 2014-2016 is presented Bulgaria Slovakia. non-European CEECs face significant delay implementation guideline assessment similar best Greece. influence BOMP expenditures budget individual significant.

参考文章(25)
Ágota Szende, Z. Mogyorósy, N. Muszbek, J. Nagy, G. Pallos, C Dözsa, Methodological guidelines for conducting economic evaluation of healthcare interventions in Hungary: a Hungarian proposal for methodology standards European Journal of Health Economics. ,vol. 3, pp. 196- 206 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S10198-002-0109-6
Arrigo Schieppati, Jan-Inge Henter, Erica Daina, Anita Aperia, Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue The Lancet. ,vol. 371, pp. 2039- 2041 ,(2008) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60872-7
Georgi Iskrov, Tsonka Miteva-Katrandzhieva, Rumen Stefanov, Challenges to orphan drugs access in Eastern Europe: The case of Bulgaria Health Policy. ,vol. 108, pp. 10- 18 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.HEALTHPOL.2012.08.013
Maria Kamusheva, Assena Stoimenova, Miglena Doneva, Albena Zlatareva, Guenka Petrova, A Cross-Country Comparison of Reimbursed Orphan Medicines in Bulgaria, Greece and Romania Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. ,vol. 27, pp. 4186- 4192 ,(2013) , 10.5504/BBEQ.2013.0066
Nebojša Pavlović, Bojan Stanimirov, Maja Stojančević, Milica Paut-Kusturica, Assena Stoimenova, Svetlana Goločorbin-Kon, Momir Mikov, None, AN INSIGHT ON DIFFERENCES IN AVAILABILITY AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ORPHAN MEDICINES AMONG SERBIA, BULGARIA AND SWEDEN Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. ,vol. 26, pp. 3236- 3241 ,(2012) , 10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0085
Assena Stoimenova, Manoela Manova, Alexandra Savova, Bistra Angelovska, Guenka Petrova, Reimbursed Orphan Medicines in Bulgaria and the Share of Biotechnology-Derived Products Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. ,vol. 25, pp. 2418- 2423 ,(2011) , 10.5504/BBEQ.2011.0043
Philip J. Brooks, N. Nora Yang, Christopher P. Austin, Gene Therapy: The View from NCATS Human Gene Therapy. ,vol. 27, pp. 7- 13 ,(2016) , 10.1089/HUM.2016.29018.PJB
Hoss A. Dowlat, The opportunities and challenges of biosimilar orphans Expert opinion on orphan drugs. ,vol. 4, pp. 563- 566 ,(2016) , 10.1517/21678707.2016.1171142