Current issues and future directions in methods for studying technology in the home

作者: Tim Coughlan , Kerstin Leder Mackley , Michael Brown , Sarah Martindale , Stephan Schlögl

DOI:

关键词: Object (philosophy)SociologyKnowledge managementEngineering ethicsReflection (computer programming)Space (commercial competition)Key issues

摘要: Homes are essential contexts in which to understand how technologies used and experienced. At the same time they hold substantial challenges for conducting research, exploring novel designs, building understanding. In this paper we review approaches studying home, including recent innovations issues that should guide further methodological reflection. We draw on expertise of a large number researchers experienced technology who have formed community map space methods use share their experiences key faced practice. Themes include utilising new as source data well an object study, creating representations home life support discussion reflection, revealing details important yet routine or mundane activities, supporting participation overcome complex ethical privacy concerns inherent study home.

参考文章(31)
Sarah Pink, Doing Sensory Ethnography ,(2009)
Gerd Kortuem, Janet van der Linden, Blaine Price, Jacky Bourgeois, Technology probes: experiences with home energy feedback ,(2013)
Alan Cooper, The Inmates are Running the Asylum Software-Ergonomie '99, Design von Informationswelten, Gemeinsame Fachtagung des German Chapter of the ACM, der Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) und der SAP AG. pp. 17- 17 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-3-322-99786-9_1
Kerstin Leder Mackley, Carolina Escobar-Tello, Tracy Bhamra, Val Mitchell, Sarah Pink, Understanding Technology in the Home: Sensory Ethnography and HCI CHI 2013: Changing Perspectives. pp. 1- 4 ,(2013)
Tim Ingold, Bindings against Boundaries: Entanglements of Life in an Open World: Environment and Planning A. ,vol. 40, pp. 1796- 1810 ,(2008) , 10.1068/A40156
Arlene M Katz, Loring Conant, Thomas S Inui, David Baron, David Bor, A council of elders: creating a multi-voiced dialogue in a community of care. Social Science & Medicine. ,vol. 50, pp. 851- 860 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00341-X