Estimating the Accuracy of Polarimetric Radar–Based Retrievals of Drop-Size Distribution Parameters and Rain Rate: An Application of Error Variance Separation Using Radar-Derived Spatial Correlations

作者: M. Thurai , V. N. Bringi , L. D. Carey , P. Gatlin , E. Schultz

DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-11-070.1

关键词: Feature (computer vision)Variance (accounting)Spatial correlationEnvironmental scienceRadarMode (statistics)PrecipitationDisdrometerPolarimetryRemote sensingMeteorologyAtmospheric Science

摘要: The accuracy of retrieving the two drop size distribution (DSD) parameters, median volume diameter (D0), and normalized intercept parameter (NW), as well as rain rate (R), from polarimetric C-band radar data obtained during a cool-season, long-duration precipitation event in Huntsville, Alabama, is examined. The radar was operated in a special “near-dwelling” mode over two video disdrometers (2DVD) located 15 km away. The polarimetric radar–based retrieval algorithms for the DSD parameters and rain rate were obtained from simulations using the 2DVD measurements of the DSD. A unique feature of this paper is the radar-based estimation of the spatial correlation functions of the two DSD parameters and rain rate that are used to estimate the “point-to-area” variance. A detailed error variance separation is performed, including the aforementioned point-to-area variance, along with variance components due to the retrieval algorithm error, radar measurement error, and disdrometer sampling error. The spatial decorrelation distance was found to be smallest for the R (4.5 km) and largest for D0 (8.24 km). For log10(NW), it was 7.22 km. The proportion of the variance of the difference between radar-based estimates and 2DVD measurements that could be explained by the aforementioned errors was 100%, 57%, and 73% for D0, log10(NW), and R, respectively. The overall accuracy of the radar-based retrievals for the particular precipitation event quantified in terms of the fractional standard deviation were estimated to be 6.8%, 6%, and 21% for D0, log10(NW), and R, respectively. The normalized bias was <1%. These correspond to time resolution of ~3 min and spatial resolution of ~1.5 km.

参考文章(46)
V. N. Bringi, V. Chandrasekar, Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar pdwr. pp. 662- ,(2001)
Alexis Berne, Joël Jaffrain, Marc Schleiss, Scaling analysis of the DSD variability at small spatial scales Proceedings of the VIth European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology. pp. 259- 264 ,(2010)
F. J. Tapiador, R. Checa, M. de Castro, An experiment to measure the spatial variability of rain drop size distribution using sixteen laser disdrometers Geophysical Research Letters. ,vol. 37, ,(2010) , 10.1029/2010GL044120
Rafael L. Bras, Ignacio Rodríguez-Iturbe, Random Functions and Hydrology ,(1984)
V.N. BRINGI, M. THURAI, K. NAKAGAWA, G.J. HUANG, T. KOBAYASHI, A. ADACHI, H. HANADO, S. SEKIZAWA, Rainfall Estimation from C-Band Polarimetric Radar in Okinawa, Japan: Comparisons with 2D-Video Disdrometer and 400 MHz Wind Profiler Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. ,vol. 84, pp. 705- 724 ,(2006) , 10.2151/JMSJ.84.705
Sergey Y. Matrosov, Evaluating Polarimetric X-Band Radar Rainfall Estimators during HMT Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. ,vol. 27, pp. 122- 134 ,(2010) , 10.1175/2009JTECHA1318.1
Henry S. Gertzman, David Atlas, Sampling errors in the measurement of rain and hail parameters Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 82, pp. 4955- 4966 ,(1977) , 10.1029/JC082I031P04955