Tail docking dairy cattle: responses from an online engagement.

作者: D. M. Weary , C. A. Schuppli , M. A. G. von Keyserlingk

DOI: 10.2527/JAS.2011-3858

关键词: Docking (dog)Country of originDemographicsScientific evidencePsychologyOnline discussionOutreachOnline engagementVeterinary medicineMarketingDairy cattle

摘要: Tail docking remains a common practice on dairy farms in the United States. This paper describes results of an online engagement designed to create discussion tail docking, document reasons participants put forward for and against practice, compare these with literature available this topic. A total 178 people responded; 30% were producers, 23% veterinarians, 25% had no experience industry, 22% included mixture teachers, students, industry professionals. Approximately 79% opposed docking. Responses varied participant demographics (e.g., females more likely than males oppose docking), but every demographic subgroup by sex, age, country origin, production experience), majority respondents Common opposition lack scientific evidence that improves cleanliness or udder health, is painful cows, unnatural, tails are important controlling flies. Some favor cited cow as issue, despite showing positive effect health. Additional protecting producer safety. These illustrate range supporting opposing approach can be used better target outreach efforts improving farmer education effects health while addressing concerns about safety). More generally, type provides safe productive format discussions contentious issues mechanism professionals, public share perspectives topics.

参考文章(26)
D. M. Weary, E. A. Pajor, B. N. Milligan, D. Fraser, A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare. ,vol. 6, pp. 187- 205 ,(1997)
Albert W. Musschenga, Naturalness: Beyond Animal Welfare Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics. ,vol. 15, pp. 171- 186 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1015040708125
JL BARNETT, GJ COLEMAN, PH HEMSWORTH, EA NEWMAN, S. FEWINGS-HALL, C. ZIINI, Tail docking and beliefs about the practice in the Victorian dairy industry. Australian Veterinary Journal. ,vol. 77, pp. 742- 747 ,(1999) , 10.1111/J.1751-0813.1999.TB12919.X
S.D. Eicher, H.W. Cheng, A.D. Sorrells, M.M. Schutz, Short communication: behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking. Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 89, pp. 3047- 3051 ,(2006) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(06)72578-4
Mhairi A. Sutherland, Cassandra B. Tucker, The long and short of it: A review of tail docking in farm animals Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 135, pp. 179- 191 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2011.10.015
S.D. Eicher, J.L. Morrow-Tesch, J.L. Albright, R.E. Williams, Tail-docking alters fly numbers, fly-avoidance behaviors, and cleanliness, but not physiological measures. Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 84, pp. 1822- 1828 ,(2001) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(01)74621-8
E.M. Tom, I.J.H. Duncan, T.M. Widowski, K.G. Bateman, K.E. Leslie, Effects of Tail Docking Using a Rubber Ring With or Without Anesthetic on Behavior and Production of Lactating Cows Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 85, pp. 2257- 2265 ,(2002) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(02)74305-1
Peter Danielson, Designing a machine to learn about the ethics of robotics: the N-reasons platform Ethics and Information Technology. ,vol. 12, pp. 251- 261 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10676-009-9214-X
W.K. Fulwider, T. Grandin, B.E. Rollin, T.E. Engle, N.L. Dalsted, W.D. Lamm, Survey of Dairy Management Practices on One Hundred Thirteen North Central and Northeastern United States Dairies Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 91, pp. 1686- 1692 ,(2008) , 10.3168/JDS.2007-0631