A Comparative Research on Designer and Customer Emotional Preference Models of New Product Development

作者: Tianxiong Wang , Liu Yang , Xian Gao , Yuxuan Jin

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49713-2_39

关键词: Product (category theory)Product designFocus groupHuman–computer interactionPreferenceComputer scienceVocabularySample (statistics)New product developmentCognitionKansei

摘要: The intelligent electric bicycle, as a means of transportation, is characterized by low pollution, noise and energy saving. Hence, how to actively research, develop promote bicycle an important topic. Meanwhile, consumer groups vary in psychology behavior, they show differences functional preference smart understand identify the between designers users preference, then reduce uncertainties manufacturers on market becomes imperative topic which great significance. In order analyze emotional terms qualitative quantitative manner, this study conducts kansei evaluation designers’ users’ visual feelings for products. model adopts semantic differential carry out analysis surveyed users. standardize cognitive description related product shape style, abstract psychological perception subjects physical characteristics extracted from customers’ natural language. Then, key vocabulary can be via factor focus group. experiment outcome contains 3 typical words are combined with their antonyms form adjective clusters. sample mean statistics approach employed calculate average value subjects’ scores adjectives regarding style. To compare customers products, uses two statistical research methods, that is, T-test correlation analysis. results could explain demonstrate obvious words. Furthermore, result, design image highly matches concluded comes up reflects strong demand experts’ cognition. Accordingly, new effective theoretical framework provided development This not only help views but also significantly increase efficiency interaction communication users, quick accurate orientation.

参考文章(23)
Poulami Das, Debnath Bhattacharyya, Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay, Tai-hoon Kim, None, Person Identification through IRIS Recognition International journal of security and its applications. ,vol. 3, pp. 129- 148 ,(2009)
Christopher D. Manning, Hinrich Schütze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing ,(1999)
Arash Shahin, Mohammad Hossein Moshref Javadi, Hossein Vaez Shahrestani, Integrating Kansei engineering and revised Kano model with a case study in the automobile industry International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management. ,vol. 13, pp. 201- 218 ,(2014) , 10.1504/IJPQM.2014.059176
Sangwoo Bahn, Myung Hwan Yun, Chang S. Nam, Cheol Lee, Incorporating affective customer needs for luxuriousness into product design attributes Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. ,vol. 19, pp. 105- 127 ,(2009) , 10.1002/HFM.V19:2
Fu Guo, Wei Lin Liu, Fan Tao Liu, Huan Wang, Tian Bo Wang, Emotional design method of product presented in multi-dimensional variables based on Kansei Engineering Journal of Engineering Design. ,vol. 25, pp. 194- 212 ,(2014) , 10.1080/09544828.2014.944488
Yasumasa Tanaka, C. E. Osgood, CROSS-CULTURE, CROSS-CONCEPT, AND CROSS-SUBJECT GENERALITY OF AFFECTIVE MEANING SYSTEMS. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 2, pp. 143- 153 ,(1965) , 10.1037/H0022392
Martin G. Helander, Halimahtun M. Khalid, Tek Yong Lim, Hong Peng, Xi Yang, Emotional needs of car buyers and emotional intent of car designers Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. ,vol. 14, pp. 455- 474 ,(2013) , 10.1080/1463922X.2012.656152
Yusuke Tani, Takehiro Nagai, Kowa Koida, Michiteru Kitazaki, Shigeki Nakauchi, Experts and Novices Use the Same Factors–But Differently–To Evaluate Pearl Quality PLoS ONE. ,vol. 9, pp. e86400- ,(2014) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0086400
Luisa Torri, Caterina Dinnella, Annamaria Recchia, Tormod Naes, Hely Tuorila, Erminio Monteleone, Projective Mapping for interpreting wine aroma differences as perceived by naïve and experienced assessors Food Quality and Preference. ,vol. 29, pp. 6- 15 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2013.01.006