A COMPARISON OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY, AND FILM‐SCREEN RADIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF CANINE PULMONARY NODULES

作者: Kate Alexander , Hugo Joly , Laurent Blond , Marc-André D'Anjou , Marie-Ève Nadeau

DOI: 10.1111/J.1740-8261.2012.01924.X

关键词: Computed tomographyRadiographyNuclear medicineMedicineRadiologyTomographyComputed radiographyNodule (medicine)Observer performanceThoracic imaging

摘要: Computed tomography (CT) has become more widely available and computed radiography (CR) replaced film-screen for canine thoracic imaging in many veterinary practices. There are limited data comparing these modalities a clinical setting to detect pulmonary nodules. We compared CT, CR, detecting the presence, number, characteristics of nodules dogs. Observer performance variety experience levels was also evaluated. Twenty-one client-owned dogs with primary neoplastic process underwent CT CR; nine received radiographs. Positive/negative classification by consensus agreed between three 8/9 CR remaining 12. detected greatest (P = 0.002) total number no difference seen films. The right middle both caudal regions, but only using < 0.0001). Significantly smaller were 0.0007) minimum size accuracy high all modalities; particularly (90.5-100%) senior radiologist (90.5-100%). characterized least interobserver variability. Although performed similarly determining presence or absence nodules, greater associated diagnostic confidence observer agreement.

参考文章(27)
Nevzat Karabulut, Mustafa Törü, Veli Gelebek, Meltem Gülsün, Macit O. Ariyürek, Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. European Radiology. ,vol. 12, pp. 2764- 2769 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00330-002-1368-4
L. Cardinale, F. Ardissone, S. Novello, M. Busso, F. Solitro, M. Longo, D. Sardo, M. Giors, C. Fava, The pulmonary nodule: clinical and radiological characteristics affecting a diagnosis of malignancy Radiologia Medica. ,vol. 114, pp. 871- 889 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11547-009-0399-1
Peter F. Lord, Juan A. Gomez, Lung lobe collapse: pathophysiology and radiologic significance Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. ,vol. 26, pp. 187- 195 ,(1985) , 10.1111/J.1740-8261.1985.TB01406.X
Erik R. Wisner, Cheryl A. London, Sarah Nemanic, Comparison of thoracic radiographs and single breath-hold helical CT for detection of pulmonary nodules in dogs with metastatic neoplasia. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. ,vol. 20, pp. 508- 515 ,(2006) , 10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[508:COTRAS]2.0.CO;2
David J. Waters, Fergus V. Coakley, Mervyn D. Cohen, Mary M. Davis, Boaz Karmazyn, Rene Gonin, Mark P. Hanna, Deborah W. Knapp, Stephen A. Heifetz, The detection of pulmonary metastases by helical CT: A clinicopathologic study in dogs Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 22, pp. 235- 240 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00004728-199803000-00014
JOHANN LANG, JEFFREY A. WORTMAN, LARRY T. GLICKMAN, DARRYL N. BIERY, W. HARKER RHODES, SENSITIVITY OF RADIOGRAPHIC DETECTION OF LUNG METASTASES IN THE DOG Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound. ,vol. 27, pp. 74- 78 ,(1986) , 10.1111/J.1740-8261.1986.TB00006.X
David J. Reese, Eric M. Green, Lisa J. Zekas, Jane E. Flores, Lawrence N. Hill, Matthew D. Winter, Clifford R. Berry, Norman Ackerman, Intra- and interobserver variability of board-certified veterinary radiologists and veterinary general practitioners for pulmonary nodule detection in standard and inverted display mode images of digital thoracic radiographs of dogs. Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 238, pp. 998- 1003 ,(2011) , 10.2460/JAVMA.238.8.998
H.Y. Lee, J.M. Goo, H.J. Lee, C.H. Lee, C.M. Park, E.-A. Park, J.-G. Im, Usefulness of concurrent reading using thin-section and thick-section CT images in subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodules. Clinical Radiology. ,vol. 64, pp. 127- 132 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.CRAD.2008.09.003
Frank Fischbach, Friedrich Knollmann, Volker Griesshaber, Torsten Freund, Ethem Akkol, Roland Felix, Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness European Radiology. ,vol. 13, pp. 2378- 2383 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00330-003-1915-7