On the Harmful Effects of Excessive Anti-Whiggism

作者: Aristides Baltas

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3596-4_7

关键词: Subject matterHistory of scienceDisciplineMeaning (existential)Cultural frameworkHistoryWhiggismEnvironmental ethics

摘要: You don’t need me to remind you that the coming of age history science has relegated discipline’s prehistory all enlightened amateurs’ attempts collect past curiosities which, under some unspecified criteria, appeared as ‘interesting’. By same token, “history science” become a legitimate academic discipline in its own right, one possessing well-delimited subject matter. History is now methodologically principled study scientific achievements, light factors which determined their production, acceptance, and diffusion gave them meaning significance first place.

参考文章(7)
THOMAS KUHN, What Are Scientific Revolutions? Philosophy, Science, and History. pp. 71- 88 ,(2014) , 10.4324/9780203802458-6
G. Gigerenzer, L. Kruger, Mary S. Morgan, The Probabilistic revolution MIT Press. ,(1987)
Steven F. Savitt, World Enough and Space-Time Dialogue. ,vol. 31, pp. 701- 706 ,(1992) , 10.1017/S0012217300016218
Thomas S. Kuhn, Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. ,vol. 1982, pp. 669- 688 ,(1982) , 10.1086/PSAPROCBIENMEETP.1982.2.192452
Aristides Baltas, Ideological "Assumptions" in Physics: Social Determinations of Internal Structures PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. ,vol. 1986, pp. 130- 151 ,(1986) , 10.1086/PSAPROCBIENMEETP.1986.2.192796
Theory and experiment Springer Netherlands. ,(1988) , 10.1007/978-94-009-2875-6
Wolfgang Spohn, On Certainty ,(1969)