Environmentalism and localism in agricultural and land-use policies can maintain food production while supporting biodiversity. Findings from simulations of contrasting scenarios in the EU

作者: Carlo Rega , John Helming , Maria Luisa Paracchini

DOI: 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.05.005

关键词: Land useCommon Agricultural PolicyNatural resource economicsBiodiversityProtectionismEuropean unionAgriculturePopulationSubsidyBusiness

摘要: Increasing food production without further harming biodiversity is a key challenge of contemporary societies. In this paper, we assess trade-offs between agricultural output and two agri-environmental indicators in four contrasting scenarios for Europe 2040. The represent different storylines encompassing assumptions on macro-economic drivers (e.g. population GDP growth rate), demand livestock products as well policy choices trade liberalisation/protectionism, conservation, regulations land-use planning subsidies to farmers through the European Union (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Through complex modelling chain, projected year 2040: i) total energy content output; ii) nitrogen surplus, proxy overall impact agriculture environment; iii) an index measuring capacity systems support biodiversity. We present both aggregate results (EU level) spatially explicit assessments at fine resolution (1 km2). Results indicate that strong neo-liberal approach (full liberalisation, abolition subsides) will lead increased use-input efficiency decrease from Nitrogen input; however, large amount area be abandoned, which absolute land homogenisation polarisation, with negative effects areas Protectionist sovereigntist policies keep cultivated high, but cost less use inputs higher impacts environment Under scenario characterised by environmental-friendly practices, multifunctional landscapes localism, significant decreases environmental pressure (compared other scenarios) can achieved minimum output. Our aiming preserving over rural areas, multifunctionality diversification contribute jointly achievement protection high production.

参考文章(56)
Batista E Silva Filipe, Lopes Barbosa Ana Luisa, Baranzelli Claudia, Jacobs Christiaan, Perpiña Castillo Carolina, Lavalle Carlo, Arevalo Torres Juan, The Reference Scenario in the LUISA platform – Updated configuration 2014Towards a Common Baseline Scenario for EC Impact Assessment procedures Publications Office of the European Union. ,(2014) , 10.2788/85104
Emilio L. La Rovere, Hugh Pitcher, Joseph Alcamo, Hans-Holger Rogner, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Keywan Riahi, Sascha van Rooijen, Bert de Vries, William Pepper, Michael Schlesinger, Steven Smith, Tom Kram, Tsuneyuki Morita, Lynn Price, Alexei Sankovski, Gerald Davis, Robert Swart, Priyadarshi Shukla, Laurie Michaelis, Shunsuke Mori, Nadejda Victor, Joergen Fenhann, Amulf Griibler, Kermeth Gregory, Tae Y. Jung, Alexander Roehrl, Zhou Dadi, Stuart Gaffin, Special report on emissions scenarios (2000). pp. 612- ,(2000)
Joern Fischer, David J. Abson, Van Butsic, M. Jahi Chappell, Johan Ekroos, Jan Hanspach, Tobias Kuemmerle, Henrik G. Smith, Henrik Wehrden, Land Sparing Versus Land Sharing: Moving Forward Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 149- 157 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12084
Claire Kremen, Reframing the land‐sparing/land‐sharing debate for biodiversity conservation Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 1355, pp. 52- 76 ,(2015) , 10.1111/NYAS.12845
Mark D. A. Rounsevell, Marc J. Metzger, Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 1, pp. 606- 619 ,(2010) , 10.1002/WCC.63
Ben Phalan, Malvika Onial, Andrew Balmford, Rhys E. Green, Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared Science. ,vol. 333, pp. 1289- 1291 ,(2011) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1208742
Alexander Popp, Florian Humpenöder, Isabelle Weindl, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky, Markus Bonsch, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Christoph Müller, Anne Biewald, Susanne Rolinski, Miodrag Stevanovic, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Land-use protection for climate change mitigation Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 4, pp. 1095- 1098 ,(2014) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2444
Fethi Şaban Özbek, Adrian Leip, Estimating the gross nitrogen budget under soil nitrogen stock changes: A case study for Turkey Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 205, pp. 48- 56 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2015.03.008