Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.

作者: Larry Carbone , Jamie Austin

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0155001

关键词: WelfareSystematic reviewAlternative medicineAnimal dataScientific literatureMEDLINEMedicineVeterinary medicineOrthopedic ProceduresIntensive care medicineAnalgesic

摘要: Scientists who perform major survival surgery on laboratory animals face a dual welfare and methodological challenge: how to choose surgical anesthetics post-operative analgesics that will best control animal suffering, knowing both pain the drugs manage can all affect research outcomes. publish full descriptions of procedures allow critical systematic reviews data, demonstrate their adherence norms, guide other scientists conduct own studies in field. We investigated what information management reasonably diligent scientist might find planning for successful experiment. To explore range fields describe this ethical concern, we scored 400 scientific articles included surgeries as part experimental methods, completeness anesthesia analgesia. The (250 accepted publication pre-2011, 150 2014-15, along with 174 they reference) thoracotomies, craniotomies, gonadectomies, organ transplants, peripheral nerve injuries, spinal laminectomies orthopedic dogs, primates, swine, mice, rats rodents. Publication Completeness (PC), which was any mention use or analgesics; Analgesia Use (AU) post-surgical analgesics, (a composite score comprising intra-operative analgesia, extended multimodal analgesia). 338 were PC. 98 these AU, some while 240 mentioned only but not Journals' caliber, measured by 2013 Impact Factor, had no effect PC AU. found whether journal instructs authors consult ARRIVE publishing guidelines published 2010 AC mouse rat our 2014-15 dataset. None 302 silent about analgesic an explicit statement withheld, discussion untreated results. conclude current literature cannot be trusted present detail analgesics. report focus more potential sources bias results, under-appreciate skew thus mostly treat solely jurisdiction care committees. At same time, regulations do include guidance even though is integral cycle building work, leaving it journals voluntarily decide details publish. suggest journals, regulators should revise regulations, treatment transparent reporting pain, improve data-quality deficiency.

参考文章(81)
Carlijn R. Hooijmans, Marlies Leenaars, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible. Atla-alternatives To Laboratory Animals. ,vol. 38, pp. 167- 182 ,(2010) , 10.1177/026119291003800208
Ralf Watzlawick, Emily S. Sena, Ulrich Dirnagl, Benedikt Brommer, Marcel A. Kopp, Malcolm R. Macleod, David W. Howells, Jan M. Schwab, Effect and Reporting Bias of RhoA/ROCK-Blockade Intervention on Locomotor Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis JAMA Neurology. ,vol. 71, pp. 91- 99 ,(2014) , 10.1001/JAMANEUROL.2013.4684
Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Orestis A. Panagiotou, Emily S. Sena, Eleni Aretouli, Evangelos Evangelou, David W. Howells, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Malcolm R. Macleod, John P. A. Ioannidis, Evaluation of Excess Significance Bias in Animal Studies of Neurological Diseases PLoS Biology. ,vol. 11, pp. e1001609- ,(2013) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1001609
Story C. Landis, Susan G. Amara, Khusru Asadullah, Chris P. Austin, Robi Blumenstein, Eileen W. Bradley, Ronald G. Crystal, Robert B. Darnell, Robert J. Ferrante, Howard Fillit, Robert Finkelstein, Marc Fisher, Howard E. Gendelman, Robert M. Golub, John L. Goudreau, Robert A. Gross, Amelie K. Gubitz, Sharon E. Hesterlee, David W. Howells, John Huguenard, Katrina Kelner, Walter Koroshetz, Dimitri Krainc, Stanley E. Lazic, Michael S. Levine, Malcolm R. Macleod, John M. McCall, Richard T. Moxley III, Kalyani Narasimhan, Linda J. Noble, Steve Perrin, John D. Porter, Oswald Steward, Ellis Unger, Ursula Utz, Shai D. Silberberg, A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research Nature. ,vol. 490, pp. 187- 191 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NATURE11556
Meredith Bara, Ari R Joffe, The methodological quality of animal research in critical care: the public face of science Annals of Intensive Care. ,vol. 4, pp. 26- 26 ,(2014) , 10.1186/S13613-014-0026-8
Claire A Coulter, Paul A Flecknell, Matthew C Leach, Claire A Richardson, None, Reported analgesic administration to rabbits undergoing experimental surgical procedures BMC Veterinary Research. ,vol. 7, pp. 12- 12 ,(2011) , 10.1186/1746-6148-7-12
Iveta Simera, David Moher, Allison Hirst, John Hoey, Kenneth F Schulz, Douglas G Altman, Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network BMC Medicine. ,vol. 8, pp. 24- 24 ,(2010) , 10.1186/1741-7015-8-24
Paola Sacerdote, Opioids and the immune system. Palliative Medicine. ,vol. 20, pp. 9- 15 ,(2006) , 10.1191/0269216306PM1124OA
Paola Sacerdote, Silvia Franchi, Alberto E. Panerai, Non-Analgesic Effects of Opioids: Mechanisms and Potential Clinical Relevance of Opioid-Induced Immunodepression Current Pharmaceutical Design. ,vol. 18, pp. 6034- 6042 ,(2012) , 10.2174/138161212803582496