Environmental and social value of agriculture innovation
作者： M. Kubankova , M. Hajek , A. Votavova
DOI: 10.17221/58/2015-AGRICECON
关键词: Value theory 、 Natural resource economics 、 Economics 、 Agriculture 、 Agricultural economics 、 Agricultural productivity 、 Value (economics) 、 Production (economics) 、 Asset (economics) 、 Sustainability 、 Market value
摘要: New requirements regarding agriculture production together with the increased pressure on environmentally friendly practices leave almost no space for routine production. Innovations that include environmental changes are therefore essential. Agricultural research faces various challenges associated quality and eff ectiveness of recently also sustainability issues. Th e paper provides a case stu- dy focused social evaluation biological asset constitutes an agricultural innovation. is shows concrete example how reporting can be constructed implemented by providing Bumblebee Nest. As result, total value consisting market, ecosystem aesthe- tic provided. Although market comprises largest proportion value, it does not exceed 64%.
cabdirect.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(35)
Charles S. Pearson, Economics and the Global Environment ,(2000)
Jaroslava Hyrslová, Miroslav Hájek, Environmental Management Accounting in the Framework of EMAS II in the Czech Republic Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 279- 295 ,(2005) , 10.1007/1-4020-3373-7_14
F. Drozen, MODELLING OF PRICE DYNAMICS AND DEPRECIATION Ekonomický časopis (Journal of Economics). ,vol. 56, pp. 1033- 1044 ,(2008)
Sylvain Payraudeau, Hayo M.G. van der Werf, Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 107, pp. 1- 19 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AGEE.2004.12.012
Michael John Jones, Accounting for biodiversity: operationalising environmental accounting Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 16, pp. 762- 789 ,(2003) , 10.1108/09513570310505961
Alena Bučánková, Vladimír Ptáček, A Test of Bombus terrestris Cocoon and other Common Methods for Nest Initiation in B. lapidarius and B. hortorum Journal of Apicultural Science. ,vol. 56, pp. 37- 47 ,(2012) , 10.2478/V10289-012-0022-X
Pernilla Gluch, Henrikke Baumann, The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making Building and Environment. ,vol. 39, pp. 571- 580 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2003.10.008
Sander Janssen, Martin K. van Ittersum, Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models Agricultural Systems. ,vol. 94, pp. 622- 636 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AGSY.2007.03.001
Hayo M.G van der Werf, Jean Petit, Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 93, pp. 131- 145 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00354-1
Brian Jørgensen, Martin Messner, Accounting and strategising: A case study from new product development Accounting, Organizations and Society. ,vol. 35, pp. 184- 204 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.AOS.2009.04.001