Composition and Modifications of Dental Implant Surfaces

作者: Michela Bruschi , Doris Steinmüller-Nethl , Walter Goriwoda , Michael Rasse

DOI: 10.1155/2015/527426

关键词: Biomedical engineeringOsseointegrationDental implantTitaniumWettingSurface modificationSurface energyMaterials scienceZirconiumImplant

摘要: Since Branemark discovered the favorable effects of titanium in bone healing 1965, has emerged as gold standard bulk material for present-time dental implantology. In course years researchers aimed improvement implants performance even at compromised implant sites and multiple factors were investigated influencing osseointegration. This review summarizes clarifies four that are currently recognized being relevant to influence tissue-implant contact ratio: materials coatings, topography, surface energy, biofunctionalization. The macrodesigns (e.g., titanium, zirconium, stainless steel, tantalum, magnesium) provide mechanical stability their on cells can be additionally improved by treatment with various (calcium phosphates, strontium, bioglasses, diamond-like carbon, diamond). Surface topography modified via different techniques increase bone-implant contact, example, plasma-spraying, grit-blasting, acid-etching, microarc oxidation. energy wettability polarity) showed a strong effect cell behavior adhesion. Functionalization bioactive molecules (via physisorption, covalent binding, or carrier systems) targets enhanced Despite satisfying clinical results presently used materials, further research innovative surfaces is inevitable pursuit perfection soft hard tissue performance.

参考文章(173)
Nanci A, Puleo Da, Brunski Jb, Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 15, pp. 15- 46 ,(2000)
Marcus Textor, Babak Chehroudi, Donald M Brunette, Hiroshi Murakami, Hugh Kim, Effects of surface topography on the connective tissue attachment to subcutaneous implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 21, pp. 354- 365 ,(2006)
S. Mohammadi, M. Esposito, M. Cucu, L. E. Ericson, P. Thomsen, Tissue response to hafnium. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 603- 611 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1011237610299
Philip A. Watson, Ziv Simon, Biomimetic dental implants--new ways to enhance osseointegration. Journal of The Canadian Dental Association. ,vol. 68, pp. 286- 288 ,(2002)
Brunski Jb, Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 3, pp. 85- 97 ,(1988)
Marjorie K Jeffcoat, Edwin A McGlumphy, Robert L Jeffcoat, Michael S Reddy, Nico C Geurs, Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 17, pp. 811- ,(2002)
S. J XIAO, M TEXTOR, N. D SPENCER, M WIELAND, B KELLER, H SIGRIST, Immobilization of the cell-adhesive peptide Arg-Gly-Asp-Cys (RGDC) on titanium surfaces by covalent chemical attachment. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 8, pp. 867- 872 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1018501804943
I. C. Lavos-Valereto, B. König, C. Rossa, E. Marcantonio, A. C. Zavaglia, A study of histological responses from Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy dental implants with and without plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating in dogs. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 273- 276 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1008975418453
Ralf-J. Kohal, Martin Wolkewitz, Constanze Mueller, Alumina-reinforced zirconia implants: survival rate and fracture strength in a masticatory simulation trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 1345- 1352 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1600-0501.2010.01954.X