Relaparotomy for suspected intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal surgery

作者: Robert R. Hutchins , M. Paul Gunning , D. Nuala Lucas , Timothy G. Allen-Mersh , Neil C. Soni

DOI: 10.1007/S00268-003-7067-8

关键词: SepsisAbdominal surgeryAbdomenSurgeryAbdominal aortic aneurysmMedicineIntensive care unitAPACHE IILaparotomySurvival rate

摘要: Relaparotomy may be beneficial in patients developing intraperitoneal sepsis after abdominal procedures. We determined whether joint clinical assessment by intensivist and surgeon (clinician assessment) identified with surgically correctable sepsis. also assessed the effect of patient age sex, disease presentation severity, interval to relaparotomy, number relaparotomies on survival relaparotomy. Data clinical, laboratory, radiologic abnormalities prior relaparotomy findings, in-hospital were prospectively collected a general hospital intensive care unit (ICU) database between January 1997 2002. Altogether, 65 1482 (4.4%) admitted ICU surgery underwent at median 5 days initial procedure. There was an 83% probability identifying treatable 43% mortality. Abdominal imaging contributed accurate information 50% cases where clinician uncertain. Patient multiorgan failure relaparotomy-but not urgency laparotomy or acute physiology chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score relaparotomies-affected outcome. Clinician had high predicting The mortality unlikely greater than nonoperative treatment intraabdominal sepsis, but 78% older 75 years raised doubts about this approach elderly. identification performance earlier might reduce rate (60%) improve it.

参考文章(15)
SCOTT H. NORWOOD, JOSEPH M. CIVETTA, Abdominal CT scanning in critically ill surgical patients. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 202, pp. 166- 175 ,(1985) , 10.1097/00000658-198508000-00006
Fabio Pacelli, Prognosis in Intra-abdominal Infections Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 131, pp. 641- 645 ,(1996) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1996.01430180067014
Thomas Koperna, Franz Schulz, Relaparotomy in Peritonitis: Prognosis and Treatment of Patients with Persisting Intraabdominal Infection World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 24, pp. 32- 37 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S002689910007
H. Schurawitzki, F. Karnel, R. Stiglbauer, S. Schimmerl, E. Salomonowitz, CT-guided percutaneous drainage and fluid aspiration in intensive care patients. Acta Radiologica. ,vol. 33, pp. 131- 136 ,(1992) , 10.1177/028418519203300210
Jorge F. Pusajó, Postoperative Intra-abdominal Sepsis Requiring Reoperation Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 128, pp. 218- 223 ,(1993) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1993.01420140095015
JAMES G. HINSDALE, BERNARD M. JAFFE, Re-operation for intra-abdominal sepsis. Indications and results in modern critical care setting. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 199, pp. 31- 36 ,(1984) , 10.1097/00000658-198401000-00006
C. McCrory, K. Crowley, Is repeat laparotomy of value in patients with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis in the intensive care unit? Irish Journal of Medical Science. ,vol. 166, pp. 88- 91 ,(1997) , 10.1007/BF02944195
John Bohnen, Prognosis in Generalized Peritonitis Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 118, pp. 285- 290 ,(1983) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1983.01390030017003
Neil A. Halpern, A. J. McElhinney, Robert Greenstein, Postoperative sepsis: reexplore or observe? Accurate indication from diagnostic abdominal paracentesis. Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 19, pp. 882- 886 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00003246-199012001-00049
WILLIAM A. KNAUS, ELIZABETH A. DRAPER, DOUGLAS P. WAGNER, JACK E. ZIMMERMAN, APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 818- 829 ,(1985) , 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009