Do Judicial Instructions Aid in Distinguishing Between Reliable and Unreliable Jailhouse Informants

作者: Stacy A. Wetmore , Jeffrey S. Neuschatz , Melanie B. Fessinger , Brian H. Bornstein , Jonathan M. Golding

DOI: 10.1177/0093854820908628

关键词: Fundamental attribution errorJury instructionsLawJustice (ethics)Psychology

摘要: Jailhouse informants are a leading cause of wrongful convictions. In an attempt to preempt such miscarriages justice, several states (e.g., Connecticut and California) have mandated that judicia...

参考文章(5)
Lee Ross, The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 10, pp. 173- 220 ,(1977) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
Patrick E. Shrout, Niall Bolger, Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods. ,vol. 7, pp. 422- 445 ,(2002) , 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
Kenneth A. Bollen, Robert Stine, DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS: CLASSICAL AND BOOTSTRAP ESTIMATES OF VARIABILITY Sociological Methodology. ,vol. 20, pp. 115- ,(1990) , 10.2307/271084
Mauricio J. Alvarez, Monica K. Miller, Brian H. Bornstein, “It will be your duty…:” The Psychology of Criminal Jury Instructions Advances in Psychology and Law. pp. 119- 158 ,(2016) , 10.1007/978-3-319-29406-3_4
Michael T. Nietzel, Denis M. McCarthy, Monica J. Kern, Juries Psychology and Law. pp. 23- 52 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-4891-1_2